Role of Cardiovascular Deaths on Changes in the Longevity Gap Between U.S. and Other Countries
Open accessAbstract
Introduction Between 2008 and 2019 the gap in life expectancy between the U.S. and other high-income countries grew significantly, with the reasons for the growth remaining unknown. This study measured the contribution of cardiovascular disease mortality in the growth of the gap in life expectancy at age 50 years (LE50) between the U.S. and 10 other high-income countries.Methods Cross-sectional observational study in 2008 and 2019, using Human Mortality Database and World Health Organization data for population aged 50 years plus as participants. Actual and counterfactual LE50s were compared to quantify the effect of cardiovascular disease mortality on the growth in the gap. Two counterfactual LE50s were calculated, one based on a cause-deleted method, and another by applying the U.S. trends to other countries. A decomposition was performed to quantify the combined effects of selected death causes and ages.Results The U.S. was the worst-performing country regarding cardiovascular disease mortality improvements between 2008 and 2019. The LE50 gap between the U.S. and the average of the other high-income countries grew 0.33 years for women, explained entirely by cardiovascular disease mortality, and 0.79 years for men, 50% of which was explained by cardiovascular disease mortality. Cardiovascular disease mortality after age 70 years was responsible for 81% of the growth of the gap among women, while for men cardiovascular disease mortality after age 70 years contributed 36%.Conclusions The slow rate of decline of cardiovascular disease mortality in the U.S. was the main driver of the growth of the LE50 gap between the U.S. and other high-income countries, so prevention of those deaths is critical.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The slowdown in the United States has exceeded that of all other high-income countries, widening the US shortfall in life expectancy relative to its peers.
“Nonetheless, the slowdown in the United States has exceeded that of all other high-income countries, resulting in a significant widening of the US shortfall in life expectancy relative to its peers (5–7).”
From Insights into US life expectancy stagnation from birth cohort mortality dynamics (2026) · cites this paper as [7]
The Results report that the U.S. life-expectancy gap at age 50 widened relative to the average of 10 other high-income countries from 2008 to 2019. But the claim that the U.S. slowdown exceeded that of all other high-income countries is too broad: the study covers 10 comparators, and the Results say the gap for women did not grow relative to France. The indexed passages provide section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 7
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [13]Preston SH, Heuveline P, Guillot M. Demography, Measuring and Modelling Population Processes. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd., 2001.
- [28]National Research Council (US), Institute of Medicine (US). In: Woolf SH, Aron L, eds. U.S. Health in International Perspective: Shorter Lives, Poorer Health. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2013. Accessed December 9, 2024 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK115854/. 24006554
- Authors
- Bramajo Hemsi, O., & Mehta, N.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-05
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 859-867
- ISSN
- 0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12358698
- OpenAlex
- W4407164975
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 15.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 357 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG075208)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
- Keywords
- cardiovascular mortality, life expectancy gap, decomposition analysis, high-income countries, mortality trends, sex differences in mortality, older adults
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cause of Death, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Life Expectancy, Longevity, Male, Middle Aged, United States, Developed Countries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review