Cited by 147Cardiovascular Disease and AdiposityCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsBariatric Surgery and Outcomes

Effects of weight loss after bariatric surgery on epicardial fat measured using echocardiography

Willens, Howard J., Byers, Patricia, Chirinos, Julio A., Labrador, Eugenio, Hare, Joshua M., de Marchena, Eduardo·2007·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Epicardial fat assessed using echocardiography is associated with abdominal visceral adipose tissue and cardiovascular risk factors. Because of its location, epicardial fat may directly affect the coronary vasculature and myocardium through local secretion of bioactive molecules. This study examines the effects of weight loss after bariatric surgery on epicardial adipose tissue in patients with severe obesity. Clinical data and echocardiograms of 23 patients with severe obesity who had echocardiograms recorded before and 8.3 +/- 3.7 months after undergoing bariatric surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Epicardial fat thickness was measured as the hypoechoic space anterior to the right ventricle in both the parasternal long- and short-axis views, and an average was obtained. At baseline, patients had increased epicardial fat compared with normal-weight controls matched for age, gender, and ethnicity (5.3 +/- 2.4 vs 3.0 +/- 1.1 mm, p <0. 001). Epicardial fat thickness was associated with the patient's initial weight in severely obese patients (r = 0.51, p = 0.011). Patients lost an average of 40 +/- 14 kg after surgery. Epicardial fat thickness decreased from 5.3 +/- 2.4 to 4.0 +/-1.6 mm (p = 0.001). Change in epicardial fat correlated with initial epicardial fat thickness measured using echocardiography (r = 0.71, p <0.001). In conclusion, epicardial fat thickness decreases in severely obese patients who have substantial weight loss after bariatric surgery. Measuring epicardial fat thickness using echocardiography may be useful to monitor visceral fat loss with weight reduction therapies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.12.042

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 147

Authors
Willens, H. J., Byers, P., Chirinos, J. A., Labrador, E., Hare, J. M., & de Marchena, E.
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Willens, Howard J.
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-05
Volume
99
Issue
9
Pages
1242-1245
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114484288
Cited by
147
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Keywords
epicardial adipose tissue, bariatric surgery, weight loss, morbid obesity, visceral adipose tissue, epicardial fat thickness, echocardiography, cardiovascular risk factors, coronary vasculature
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Pericardium, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Bariatric Surgery, Adiposity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review