Cited by 87Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

Quality of Life Within One Year Following Presentation After Transient Loss of Consciousness

van Dijk, Nynke, Sprangers, Mirjam A., Boer, Kimberly R., Colman, Nancy, Wieling, Wouter, Linzer, Mark·2007·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine (1) changes in quality of life (QoL) within 1 year after presentation with transient loss of consciousness (TLOC) and (2) which factors are predictive of these changes. This study was part of the Fainting Assessment Study (FAST), which assessed diagnostic strategies in patients with TLOC. Adult patients presenting to Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, with TLOC were included in the study. QoL was assessed with the generic Short Form 36 and the disease-specific Syncope Functional Status Questionnaire at presentation and 1 year of follow-up. Of 468 included patients, 82% completed questionnaires at presentation and 72% after 1-year follow-up. QoL improved on 7 of 8 subscales of the Short Form 36 and on all summary scales of the Syncope Functional Status Questionnaire. Older age, recurrence, higher level of co-morbidity, and a neurologic or psychogenic diagnosis were predictive of poorer QoL. In conclusion, QoL in patients with TLOC improves significantly over time. Physicians should particularly pay attention to patients who are older, have recurrent episodes, a neurologic or psychogenic diagnosis, and a higher level of co-morbidity because these patients are vulnerable to a relatively poorer QoL.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.03.085

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 87

Authors
van Dijk, N., Sprangers, M. A., Boer, K. R., Colman, N., Wieling, W., & Linzer, M.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-08
Volume
100
Issue
4
Pages
672-676
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032845009
Cited by
87
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Medtronic
  • Hartstichting
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
transient loss of consciousness, syncope, quality of life, long-term outcomes, predictors of quality of life, recurrent syncope, psychogenic syncope, comorbidities, aging, Short Form-36
MeSH terms
Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Prognosis, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Syncope, Time Factors, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review