After the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study: implications for fenofibrate.
Abstract
The Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study provides an extensive evidence base for the efficacy and tolerability of fenofibrate treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, predominantly in a primary prevention setting. The FIELD study did not show a significant effect with fenofibrate on the primary end point, coronary artery disease death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (p = 0.16). Treatment with fenofibrate did reduce all cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, the secondary end point (by 11%, p = 0.035). The primary end point was reduced by the same percentage. The modest percent reduction in the primary and secondary end points is probably a result of a number of study confounders, notably an excess of statin drop-in therapy and disproportionate treatment with other drugs for CVD prevention in the placebo arm. Estimates of relative risk reduction used by the FIELD investigators to equalize the use of statins in the fenofibrate and placebo groups suggest a true benefit of treatment on reduction of CVD events of 17%-21%. There was no excess of elevated serum liver enzymes and no cases of rhabdomyolysis in patients receiving both fenofibrate and a statin. Prevention of microvascular disease, specifically, reduction in the rate of laser treatment for retinopathy (by 30%, p = 0.0003), progression of albuminuria (p = 0.002), and nontraumatic amputations (by 38%, p = 0.011), may well be the most innovative finding of the FIELD study, especially in view of the current lack of effective preventative treatments for diabetic retinopathy and the need for additional treatments that slow the progression of diabetic nephropathy. These findings also give impetus to investigate mechanisms by which fenofibrate and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha activation may protect the endothelium of small blood vessels in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These studies also indicate that treatment of patients with triglycerides below 200 mg/dl does not confer benefit.
“However, these studies also indicate that treatment of patients with triglycerides below 200 mg/dl does not confer benefit.”
From Evaluation and Treatment of Hypertriglyceridemia: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline (2012) · cites this paper as [172]
Post hoc subgroup analyses of all of these trials show that the use of fibrates in patients with moderate hypertriglyceridemia results in a decrease in composite cardiovascular events, but not a decrease in mortality.
“Post hoc subgroup analyses of all of these trials show that the use of fibrates in patients with moderate hypertriglyceridemia results in a decrease in composite cardiovascular events, but not a decrease in mortality (170 -172).”
From Evaluation and Treatment of Hypertriglyceridemia: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline (2012) · cites this paper as [172]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 50
- Authors
- Sacks, F. M.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sacks, Frank M.
- ORCID
- Sacks, Frank M.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 34L-40L
- ISSN
- 0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031622072
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 6.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
- Keywords
- fenofibrate, field trials, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease prevention, coronary artery disease mortality, myocardial infarction, diabetic retinopathy, albuminuria, diabetic nephropathy, non-traumatic amputation, PPARα, endothelial protection, drug tolerability, liver enzymes
- MeSH terms
- Anticholesteremic Agents, Hypolipidemic Agents, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Drug Therapy, Combination, Endothelium, Vascular, Humans, Primary Prevention, Fenofibrate, Risk, Disease Progression, Risk Assessment, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, PPAR alpha
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review