Meta-analysis of ablation of atrial flutter and supraventricular tachycardia
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of typical atrial flutter (AFL) and atrioventricular node-dependent supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in adult patients. Medline and EMBASE were searched (1990 to 2007) for all study design trials of RFA. Data relating to single- and multiple-procedure success, arrhythmia recurrence, repeat ablation, adverse events, and death were extracted. For RFA in AFL, 18 primary studies with 22 treatment arms and 1,323 patients were identified. Single-procedure success for AFL was 91.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.4% to 94.9%). Multiple-procedure success was 97.0% (95% CI 94.7% to 99.4%). Postablation arrhythmia was noted in 13.2% of patients (95% CI 7.5% to 18.9%), while repeat ablation was reported in 8% (95% CI 4.5% to 11.4%). For RFA of SVT, 39 primary studies with 49 treatment arms in 7,693 patients with accessory pathways and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia were identified. Single-procedure success for SVT was 93.2% (95% CI 90.8% to 95.5%). Multiple-procedure success was 94.6% (95% CI 92.4% to 96.9). Postablation arrhythmia was noted in 5.6% patients (95% CI 4.1% to 7.2%). Repeat ablation occurred in 6.5% (95% CI 4.7% to 8.3%). For AFL studies, all-cause mortality was 0.6%, and adverse events were reported in 0.5% of patients. For SVT studies, all-cause mortality was 0.1%, and adverse events were reported in 2.9% of patients. In conclusion, studies of RFA for the treatment of patients with AFL and SVT report high efficacy rates and low rates of complications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the latest meta-analysis, AVRT carried a mortality rate of 0.1% after radiofrequency ablation, while there was no procedural-related mortality for AFL or AVNRT.
“Although these rates are higher than most experienced electrophysiologists have in daily practice, in the latest meta-analysis AVRT still carried a mortality rate of 0.1% after radiofrequency ablation, whereas there was no procedural-related mortality for AFL or AVNRT.244”
From European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document on the management of supraventricular arrhythmias, endorsed by Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulacion Cardiaca y Electrofisiologia (SOLAECE) (2017) · cites this paper as [244]
Ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus for isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter restores and maintains sinus rhythm with a success rate of 90-95%.
“Ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus for isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter (either the common counter-clockwise atrial flutter or the less-common clockwise atrial flutter) restores and maintains sinus rhythm with a success rate of 90-95%.1002”
From 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS (2016) · cites this paper as [1002]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 268
- Authors
- Spector, P., Reynolds, M. R., Calkins, H., Sondhi, M., Xu, Y., Martin, A., Williams, C. J., & Sledge, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Vermont (US)
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Venue
- The American Journal of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 671-677
- ISSN
- 0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104509861
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Biosense Webster
- Medtronic
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
- Keywords
- atrial flutter, supraventricular tachycardia, radiofrequency catheter ablation, procedural success, arrhythmia recurrence, repeat ablation, adverse events, all-cause mortality
- MeSH terms
- Atrial Flutter, Humans, Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry, Treatment Outcome, Catheter Ablation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review