Cited by 96Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiovascular Effects of Exercise

Ability of Terminal QRS Notching to Distinguish Benign from Malignant Electrocardiographic Forms of Early Repolarization

Merchant, Faisal M., Noseworthy, Peter A., Weiner, Rory B., Singh, Sheldon M., Ruskin, Jeremy N., Reddy, Vivek Y.·2009·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Recent studies have suggested that early repolarization (ER) might be associated with up to 1/3 of idiopathic ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) cases ("malignant" ER). We sought to identify electrocardiographic features to distinguish benign from malignant variants of ER. We reviewed the medical records for implantable-cardioverter defibrillators implanted at a single institution (1988 to 2008) to identify cases of idiopathic VT/VF. The electrocardiograms were scored for ER, defined as a >or=0.1-mV elevation of the QRS-ST junction manifesting as J-point slurring or notching in 2 contiguous leads. We also identified a cohort of 200 healthy age- and gender-matched controls with electrocardiographic findings previously identified as normal ER ("benign" ER cohort). Of 1,224 consecutive implantable-cardioverter defibrillator implants, we identified 39 cases of idiopathic VT/VF. Of the 39 cases, 9 (23%) demonstrated ER. During a mean follow-up of 7.2 +/- 4.6 years, the combined end point of appropriate implantable-cardioverter defibrillator shocks or all-cause mortality occurred less frequently in cases of idiopathic VT/VF with ER than in those without ER (11% vs 30%, odds ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.03 to 2.69, p = 0.40). A comparison of the electrocardiograms between those with malignant ER and controls demonstrated that QRS notching was significantly more prevalent among cases when present in leads V4 (44% vs 5%, p = 0.001) and V5 (44% vs 8%, p =…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.06.062

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Merchant, F. M., Noseworthy, P. A., Weiner, R. B., Singh, S. M., Ruskin, J. N., & Reddy, V. Y.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
Reddy, Vivek Y.
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
104
Issue
10
Pages
1402-1406
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004980852
Cited by
96
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 14
FWCI
8.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Keywords
early repolarization, idiopathic ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, risk stratification, precordial leads, all-cause mortality
MeSH terms
Adult, Electrocardiography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Ventricular Fibrillation, Case-Control Studies, Defibrillators, Implantable, Tachycardia, Ventricular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review