Relation of echocardiographic epicardial fat thickness and myocardial fat
Abstract
Epicardial and myocardial fats increase with degree of visceral adiposity and possibly contribute to obesity-associated cardiac changes. Echocardiographic epicardial fat thickness is a new and independent marker of visceral adiposity. The aim of this study was to test whether echocardiographic epicardial fat is related to myocardial fat. Twenty consecutive Caucasian men (body mass index 30.5 +/- 2 kg/m(2), 42 +/- 7 years of age) underwent transthoracic echocardiography for epicardial fat thickness, morphologic and diastolic parameter measurements, hydrogen-1 magnetic resonance spectroscopy for myocardial fat quantification, and magnetic resonance imaging for epicardial fat volume estimation. Hydrogen-1 magnetic resonance spectroscopic myocardial fat content, magnetic resonance imaging of epicardial fat volume, and echocardiographic epicardial fat thickness range varied from 0.5% to 31%, 4.5 to 43 ml, and 3 to 15 mm, respectively. Myocardial fat content showed a statistically significant correlation with echocardiographic epicardial fat thickness (r = 0.79, p <0.01), waist circumference (r = 0.64, p <0.01), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (r = 0.54, p <0.01), plasma adiponectin levels (r = -0.49, p <0.01), and isovolumic relaxation time (r = 0.59, p <0.01). However, multivariate linear regression analysis showed epicardial fat thickness as the most significant independent correlate of myocardial fat (p <0.001). Although this study is purely correlative and no causative conclusions can be drawn, it can be postulated that increased echocardiographic epicardial fat accumulation could reflect myocardial fat in subjects with a wide range of adiposity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
EAT can be easily measured with standard ultrasound and independently reflects intra-abdominal visceral fat and myocardial triglyceride content.
“Epicardial adipose tissue can be easily measured with standard ultrasound and independently reflects intra-abdominal visceral fat and myocardial triglyceride content [7–10].”
From Effects of Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide on Epicardial Fat Thickness in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity (2020) · cites this paper as [10]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 148
- Authors
- Malavazos, A. E., Di Leo, G., Secchi, F., Lupo, E. N., Dogliotti, G., Coman, C., Morricone, L., Corsi, M. M., Sardanelli, F., & Iacobellis, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Milan (IT)
- IRCCS Policlinico San Donato (IT)
- McMaster University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Iacobellis, Gianluca
- ORCID
- Venue
- The American Journal of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1831-1835
- ISSN
- 0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1980854525
- Cited by
- 148
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 6.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- epicardial fat thickness, myocardial fat, visceral fat, obesity, magnetic resonance imaging, waist circumference, adiponectin, LDL cholesterol, isovolumic relaxation time, diastolic function, cardiac magnetic resonance
- MeSH terms
- Adipose Tissue, Adult, Echocardiography, Heart Diseases, Humans, Lipids, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Myocardium, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Obesity, Pericardium, Prognosis, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Body Mass Index
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review