Atrial arrhythmias in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia and ventricular tachycardia
Abstract
Information on atrial arrhythmia associated with right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D) is limited. In 36 patients with task force criteria for ARVC/D and history of ventricular tachycardia (VT), we confirmed the incidence and type of atrial arrhythmia, onset related to referral for VT ablation, fastest documented ventricular rate, management, and clinical and hemodynamic factors associated with their development. Thirty-six patients (28 men) had a mean age of 47 years (range 17 to 80) and mean follow-up of 56 +/- 44 months. Thirty-five patients (97%) had implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) devices, 15 with atrial leads. Fifteen of 36 patients (42%) had documented atrial arrhythmias, with atrial flutter (aFL) in 11, atrial fibrillation (AF) in 11 patients, and aFL and AF in 7 patients. Maximum heart rate noted with atrial arrhythmia was 62 to 150 beats/min. In 9 patients, initial atrial arrhythmia preceded or was concurrent with presentation for VT ablation. In the remaining 6 patients, atrial arrhythmia (symptomatic in 4 patients) followed VT presentation. Three of these patients received ICD shock therapy for atrial arrhythmias. Seven of 11 patients with recurrent aFL required aFL ablation, 1 patient underwent His-bundle ablation for AF with rapid rate, and 8 patients required long-term drug therapy for AF control. Atrial arrhythmias were more common in patients with RV enlargement and moderate/severe tricuspid regurgitation. In conclusion, in patients…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AF prevalence in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy is >40% in patients with VTs.
“Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy Several desmosomal genes, unknown gene loci >40% in patients with VTs 867, 868”
From 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS (2016) · cites this paper as [868]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 9 · Cited by 62
- Authors
- Chu, A. F., Zado, E., & Marchlinski, F. E.
- Affiliations
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Venue
- The American Journal of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 720-722
- ISSN
- 0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079091798
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
- Keywords
- arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, atrial arrhythmias, atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, atrial flutter ablation, tricuspid regurgitation, right ventricular dilatation, His bundle ablation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Catheter Ablation, Tachycardia, Ventricular, Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review