Effect of clinical triggers on positive responses to tilt-table testing potentiated with nitroglycerin or clomipramine
Abstract
The effect of clinical triggers on tilt-table testing (TTT) responses has not been systematically evaluated. In the present study, we evaluated the effect of clinical triggers on positive responses to TTT potentiated with nitroglycerin (which acts mainly through peripheral dilation) or clomipramine (which acts mainly through a central serotoninergic mechanism). We enrolled 380 consecutive adult patients. In 66 patients, syncope was triggered by emotional distress (central trigger), in 161 by specific situations or prolonged standing (peripheral trigger), and in 153 syncope occurred in the absence of any detectable trigger. Nitroglycerin TTT, performed in 252 patients, consisted of a passive phase of 20 minutes followed, if negative, by sublingual administration of 400 μg nitroglycerin spray and continuation of tilting for 15 minutes. Clomipramine TTT, performed in 128 patients, consisted of 20 minutes of tilting with intravenous administration of 5 mg clomipramine during the first 5 minutes. The positivity of nitroglycerin TTT was greater in patients with clinical triggers (71% central and 75% peripheral) than in those without (36%). With clomipramine TTT, the positivity rate was greater in patients with central triggers (92%) than in those with peripheral triggers (45%) or no triggers (30%). The cardioinhibitory form was more frequent in patients with a central trigger than in the other 2 groups (34% vs 12% and 7%) and with clomipramine TTT than with nitroglycerin TTT (19% vs 11%, respectively). In contrast, mixed or vasodepressor forms were more frequently induced by nitroglycerin TTT (41% vs 24%). In conclusion, the presence of clinical triggers increased the positivity of TTT and influenced the type of response. We found some specificity of nitroglycerin and clomipramine for peripheral and central mechanisms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tilt testing was positive in 51-56% of patients with atypical clinical features suggesting a reflex mechanism.
“Indeed, tilt testing was positive in 51-56% of patients with atypical clinical features suggesting a reflex mechanism, 106,124-128”
From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [126]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- Furukawa, T., Maggi, R., Solano, A., Croci, F., & Brignole, M.
- Affiliations
- Presidio Ospedaliero (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Brignole, Michele
- Venue
- The American Journal of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1693-1697
- ISSN
- 0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1981291454
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Keywords
- syncope, tilt table test, emotional distress, prolonged standing, nitroglycerin, clomipramine, vasovagal syncope, cardioinhibitory syncope, vasodepressor syncope, peripheral vasodilation
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Clomipramine, Female, Nitroglycerin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Syncope, Vasodilator Agents, Tilt-Table Test
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review