Cited by 15Coronary Interventions and DiagnosticsDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Presentation in patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease and type II diabetes mellitus (from the BARI 2D Clinical Trial)

Open access
Krishnaswami, Ashok, Hardison, Regina, Nesto, Richard W., Sobel, Burton·2012·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Clinically stable patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease are not often thought to present with the symptom of typical angina. The aims of this study were to enumerate the proportion of patients presenting with typical angina or other cardiac symptoms and to elucidate what important clinical variables are associated with the presence of typical angina in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and angiographically documented coronary artery disease. Symptoms of angina, anginal equivalents, or an absence of symptoms were obtained using baseline data from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial (n = 2,319). A bivariate analysis stratified by the presence or absence of previous revascularization and logistic regression modeling with a stepwise covariate selection was used. Eighty-two percent of patients had symptoms, while 18% presented asymptomatically. This was further divided approximately into typical angina (1/5), anginal equivalents (1/5), combination (2/5), and asymptomatic (1/5). A history of previous revascularization was a determinant of the type of symptom presentation with regard to the variables gender, age, current insulin use, myocardial jeopardy index score, and use of β blockers. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, of the available candidate variables, only a history of β-blocker use (odds ratio 1.53, 95% confidence interval 1.24 to 1.94, p <0.0001) and previous percutaneous coronary intervention (odds ratio 1.55, 95% confidence interval 1.24 to 1.94, p <0.0001) had higher odds of an association with typical angina. In conclusion, a large proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease indeed have symptoms. Future studies of long-term outcomes associated with these symptoms are needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.08.004

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 510 asymptomatic patients with diabetes without prior CVD, computed tomography revealed calcifications indicating the presence of coronary atherosclerosis in 46% of patients.

    “In 510 asymptomatic patients with diabetes without prior CVD, computed tomography (CT) revealed calcifications indicating the presence of coronary atherosclerosis in 46% of patients.384”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 15

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [5]Alderman EL SM. The angiographic definitions of the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation. Coronary Artery Disease 1992; 3: 1189– 1207

Authors
Krishnaswami, A., Hardison, R., Nesto, R. W., & Sobel, B.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Lahey Hospital and Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Krishnaswami, Ashok
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
109
Issue
1
Pages
36-41
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106983570
Cited by
15
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, typical angina, presenting symptoms, asymptomatic patients, beta-blocker use, percutaneous coronary intervention, insulin use, BARI 2D trial
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Glucose, Coronary Artery Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Revascularization, Prognosis, Time Factors, Coronary Angiography, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review