Cited by 187Cardiovascular Disease and AdiposityAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

Meta-Analysis of the Relation of Echocardiographic Epicardial Adipose Tissue Thickness and the Metabolic Syndrome

Pierdomenico, Sante D., Pierdomenico, Anna M., Cuccurullo, Franco, Iacobellis, Gianluca·2013·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is an emerging cardiometabolic risk factor, and its thickness can be measured using echocardiography. The relation of EAT to the metabolic syndrome (MS) is still unclear. A meta-analysis of published reports was performed to provide comprehensive insight on the association of EAT thickness as assessed by echocardiography and the MS. A systematic search was conducted for reports on echocardiographic EAT thickness in patients with and without the MS. Nine studies were identified. The pooled population consisted of 2,027 subjects, of whom 1,030 had the MS. EAT thickness was significantly higher in patients with the MS than in those without (standardized difference in means 1.15 mm, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.53, p = 0.0001). Subgroup meta-analysis showed no difference between patients with and those without the MS by MS criteria used and echocardiographic cardiac cycle of measurement but did show a significant difference by ethnicity, with a greater difference in Caucasian subjects (standardized difference in means 1.75 mm, 95% confidence interval 1.43 to 2.07) than in other ethnic groups. In conclusion, echocardiographic EAT thickness is significantly higher in patients with the MS than in those without, but differences exist by ethnicity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.08.044

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 187

Authors
Pierdomenico, S. D., Pierdomenico, A. M., Cuccurullo, F., & Iacobellis, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
  • University of Miami (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
111
Issue
1
Pages
73-78
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012804076
Cited by
187
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Keywords
epicardial adipose tissue, EAT thickness, metabolic syndrome, echocardiography, cardiometabolic risk, ethnic differences, cardiovascular risk factors
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Coronary Artery Disease, Echocardiography, Humans, Pericardium, Risk Factors, Body Mass Index, Metabolic Syndrome, Adiposity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review