Meta-Analysis of the Relation of Echocardiographic Epicardial Adipose Tissue Thickness and the Metabolic Syndrome
Abstract
Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is an emerging cardiometabolic risk factor, and its thickness can be measured using echocardiography. The relation of EAT to the metabolic syndrome (MS) is still unclear. A meta-analysis of published reports was performed to provide comprehensive insight on the association of EAT thickness as assessed by echocardiography and the MS. A systematic search was conducted for reports on echocardiographic EAT thickness in patients with and without the MS. Nine studies were identified. The pooled population consisted of 2,027 subjects, of whom 1,030 had the MS. EAT thickness was significantly higher in patients with the MS than in those without (standardized difference in means 1.15 mm, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.53, p = 0.0001). Subgroup meta-analysis showed no difference between patients with and those without the MS by MS criteria used and echocardiographic cardiac cycle of measurement but did show a significant difference by ethnicity, with a greater difference in Caucasian subjects (standardized difference in means 1.75 mm, 95% confidence interval 1.43 to 2.07) than in other ethnic groups. In conclusion, echocardiographic EAT thickness is significantly higher in patients with the MS than in those without, but differences exist by ethnicity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
EAT can be easily measured with standard ultrasound and independently reflects intra-abdominal visceral fat and myocardial triglyceride content.
“Epicardial adipose tissue can be easily measured with standard ultrasound and independently reflects intra-abdominal visceral fat and myocardial triglyceride content [7–10].”
From Effects of Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide on Epicardial Fat Thickness in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity (2020) · cites this paper as [8]
EAT is a modifiable and measurable cardiovascular risk factor that is thicker in subjects with diabetes, owing to its strong correlation with visceral adiposity and insulin resistance.
“EAT has shown to be a modifiable and measurable cardiovascular risk factor that is thicker in subjects with diabetes, owing to its strong correlation with visceral adiposity and insulin resistance [7–9].”
From Effects of Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide on Epicardial Fat Thickness in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity (2020) · cites this paper as [8]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 187
- Authors
- Pierdomenico, S. D., Pierdomenico, A. M., Cuccurullo, F., & Iacobellis, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
- University of Miami (US)
- Venue
- The American Journal of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-78
- ISSN
- 0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012804076
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8
- FWCI
- 2.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
- Keywords
- epicardial adipose tissue, EAT thickness, metabolic syndrome, echocardiography, cardiometabolic risk, ethnic differences, cardiovascular risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Adipose Tissue, Coronary Artery Disease, Echocardiography, Humans, Pericardium, Risk Factors, Body Mass Index, Metabolic Syndrome, Adiposity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review