Incidence of Myocardial Infarction With Shifts to and From Daylight Savings Time
Abstract
Modulators of normal bodily functions such as the duration and quality of sleep might transiently influence cardiovascular risk. The transition to daylight savings time (DST) has been associated with a short-term increased incidence ratio (IR) of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The present retrospective study examined the IR of AMIs that presented to our hospitals the week after DST and after the autumn switch to standard time, October 2006 to April 2012, with specific reference to the AMI type. Our study population (n = 935 patients; 59% men, 41% women) was obtained from the electronic medical records of the Royal Oak and Troy campuses of the Beaumont Hospitals in Michigan. Overall, the frequency of AMI was similar in the spring and autumn, 463 (49.5%) and 472 (50.5%), respectively. The IR for the first week after the spring shift was 1.17 (95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.36). After the transition from DST in the autumn, the IR for the same period was lower, but not significantly different, 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.85 to 1.16). Nevertheless, the greatest increase in AMI occurred on the first day (Sunday) after the spring shift to DST (1.71, 95% confidence interval 1.09 to 2.02; p <0.05). Also, a significantly greater incidence was found of non-ST-segment myocardial infarction after the transition to DST in the study group compared with that in the control group (p = 0.022). In conclusion, these data suggest that shifts to and from DST might transiently affect the incidence and type of acute cardiac events, albeit modestly.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A mere 1-hour advance in behaviors relative to circadian time, as occurs with a shift to daylight savings time in the spring, is associated with a transient increase in the incidence of myocardial infarctions.
“Moreover, a mere 1-hour advance in behaviors relative to circadian time, as occurs with a shift to daylight savings time in the spring, is associated with a transient increase in the incidence of myocardial infarctions (157).”
From Role of the circadian system in cardiovascular disease (2018) · cites this paper as [157]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 72
- Authors
- Jiddou, M. R., Pica, M., Boura, J., Qu, L., & Franklin, B. A.
- Affiliations
- Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital (US)
- Oakland University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Franklin, Barry A.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 631-635
- ISSN
- 0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998169393
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Keywords
- daylight saving time, acute myocardial infarction, time zone transitions, cardiovascular risk, sleep duration, circadian rhythm, incidence ratio
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Circadian Rhythm, Electrocardiography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Michigan, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Periodicity, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Incidence, Confidence Intervals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review