Efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs in adults with congenital heart disease and supraventricular tachycardias
Abstract
Supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs) are a major cause of morbidity in adults with congenital heart disease (CHD). Few data exist on safety and efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs in this population. Our aim was to determine the efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs in adults with CHD and first-onset SVT on maintaining sinus rhythm after conversion. This was a multicenter retrospective study including adults with CHD and first-onset SVT from January 2008 to January 2011. First-onset SVT occurred in 92 of 7,171 patients without previous SVT (mean age 51 ± 16 years, 57% women). SVTs included atrial fibrillation and flutter in >80% of the patients. Most of these patients had septal defects (50%) and left-sided lesions (21%). The acute management of SVTs resulted in sinus rhythm in 83 patients, and 89% of these patients were instituted on oral antiarrhythmics to prevent SVT recurrence. After a mean follow-up of 2.5 ± 1.4 years, only 45% of the patients were free from SVT. Class III antiarrhythmics (85% sotalol and 15% amiodarone) were associated with a significantly lesser risk of SVT recurrence compared with all other antiarrhythmic drugs (hazard ratio 0.5, 95% confidence interval 0.27 to 0.96, p = 0.036). However, adverse effects of medication occurred in 22% of the patients, mainly in patients taking amiodarone. In conclusion, in adults with CHD and first-onset SVTs, class III antiarrhythmics are more efficacious in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion than other antiarrhythmics. Sotalol may be considered as the first-choice therapy as this is associated with fewer adverse effects than amiodarone.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Although amiodarone is less often associated with proarrhythmia, its severe side effects (thyroid and pulmonary disorders) limit its long-term use in ACHD patients.
“Although amiodarone is less often associated with proarrhythmia, the severe side effects (thyroid and pulmonary disorders) limit its long-term use in these patients.368”
From European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document on the management of supraventricular arrhythmias, endorsed by Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulacion Cardiaca y Electrofisiologia (SOLAECE) (2017) · cites this paper as [368]
Based on retrospective studies comparing AAD for prevention of SVT in CHD patients, only 45% of patients were free from SVT after 2.5 years follow-up.
“Based on retrospective studies comparing AAD for prevention of SVT in CHD patients, only 45% of the patients were free from SVT after 2.5 years follow-up.”
From European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document on the management of supraventricular arrhythmias, endorsed by Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulacion Cardiaca y Electrofisiologia (SOLAECE) (2017) · cites this paper as [368]
Although Class III AADs such as sotalol and amiodarone were most effective, adverse effects were common (22%).
“Although Class III AADs such as sotalol and amiodarone were most effective, adverse effects were common (22%).368”
From European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document on the management of supraventricular arrhythmias, endorsed by Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulacion Cardiaca y Electrofisiologia (SOLAECE) (2017) · cites this paper as [368]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 88
- Authors
- Koyak, Z., Kroon, B., de Groot, J. R., Wagenaar, L. J., van Dijk, A. P., Mulder, B. A., Van Gelder, I. C., Post, M. C., Mulder, B. J. M., & Bouma, B. J.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Medisch Spectrum Twente (NL)
- University of Groningen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Koyak, Zeliha
- Venue
- The American Journal of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1461-1467
- ISSN
- 0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021624964
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 5.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
- Keywords
- supraventricular tachycardia, congenital heart disease, antiarrhythmic drugs, sotalol, amiodarone, class III antiarrhythmic agents, cardioversion, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, septal defects, adverse drug reactions, sinus rhythm maintenance
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Defects, Congenital, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Morbidity, Netherlands, Retrospective Studies, Tachycardia, Supraventricular, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review