Usefulness of Nutraceuticals (Armolipid Plus) Versus Ezetimibe and Combination in Statin-Intolerant Patients With Dyslipidemia With Coronary Heart Disease
Abstract
Statins are extensively used to treat dyslipidemia, but, because of their low tolerability profile, they are discontinued in a significant proportion of patients. Ezetimibe and nutraceuticals have been introduced as alternative therapies and have proved to be effective and well tolerated. A single-blind, single-center, randomized, prospective, and parallel group trial comparing a combination of nutraceuticals (red yeast rice, policosanol, berberine, folic acid, coenzyme Q10 and astaxanthin), called Armolipid Plus, and ezetimibe for 3 months in terms of efficacy and tolerability. Patients who did not achieve their therapeutic target (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dl) could add the alternative treatment on top of randomized treatment for another 12 months: 100 patients who are dyslipidemic with ischemic heart disease treated with percutaneous coronary intervention were enrolled (ezetimibe n = 50, nutraceutical n = 50). Efficacy (lipid profile) and tolerability (adverse events, transaminases, and creatine kinase) were assessed after 3 and 12 months. After 3 months, 14 patients in the nutraceutical group achieved their therapeutic target, whereas none of the patients in the ezetimibe group did. At 1-year follow-up, 58 patients (72.5%) of the combined therapy group (n = 86) and 14 (100%) of the nutraceutical group reached the therapeutic goal. No patients experienced important undesirable effects. In conclusion, nutraceuticals alone or in combination with ezetimibe are well tolerated and improve the lipid profile in statin-intolerant patients with coronary heart disease. Further studies are needed to assess long-term effects of nutraceuticals on mortality.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ezetimibe efficacy has been improved by the association with RYR, policosanol, and berberine.
“Ezetimibe efficacy has been improved by the association with RYR, policosanol, and berberine [108, 109]”
From Nutraceuticals in the Management of Dyslipidemia: Which, When, and for Whom? Could Nutraceuticals Help Low-Risk Individuals with Non-optimal Lipid Levels? (2021) · cites this paper as [108]
In a single-blind randomized trial of 100 statin-intolerant PCI patients not at target, after 3 months 14 (28%) in the nutraceutical group reached target versus 0 in the ezetimibe group.
“After 3 months, compared with 0 patients in the ezetimibe group, 14 patients (28%) in the nutraceutical group achieved their therapeutic target.”
From The Role of Nutraceuticals in Statin Intolerant Patients (2018) · cites this paper as [144]
In both groups, LDL-C, TC, and TG fell significantly from baseline and HDL-C rose significantly.
“values progressively and significantly decreased from baseline throughout treatment (p < 0.001 for all), whereas HDL-C (40 Æ 7 mg/dl [1.03 Æ 0.18 mmol/l] vs. 41 Æ 8 mg/dl [1.06 Æ 0.21 mmol/l]) values progressively and significantly increased in both groups (p < 0.001) (144).”
From The Role of Nutraceuticals in Statin Intolerant Patients (2018) · cites this paper as [144]
At 1 year, 58 (72.5%) of the combined therapy group and 14 (100%) of the nutraceutical group reached the therapeutic goal.
“At 1-year follow-up, 58 patients (72.5%) of the combined therapy group (n ¼ 86) and 14 (100%) of the nutraceutical group reached the therapeutic goal (144).”
From The Role of Nutraceuticals in Statin Intolerant Patients (2018) · cites this paper as [144]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 48
- Authors
- Marazzi, G., Pelliccia, F., Campolongo, G., Quattrino, S., Cacciotti, L., Volterrani, M., Gaudio, C., & Rosano, G.
- Affiliations
- IRCCS San Raffaele Roma (IT)
- Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
- Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Marazzi, Giuseppe
- Venue
- The American Journal of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1798-1801
- ISSN
- 0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1836683183
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6
- FWCI
- 7.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Natural Products and Biological Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
- Keywords
- nutraceuticals, ezetimibe, statin intolerance, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, LDL cholesterol lowering, red yeast rice, policosanol, berberine, folic acid, coenzyme Q10, astaxanthin, percutaneous coronary intervention, lipid profile, tolerability
- MeSH terms
- Ezetimibe, Cholesterol, Coronary Artery Disease, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Dietary Supplements, Dyslipidemias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review