Cited by 48Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthNatural Products and Biological ResearchCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism

Usefulness of Nutraceuticals (Armolipid Plus) Versus Ezetimibe and Combination in Statin-Intolerant Patients With Dyslipidemia With Coronary Heart Disease

Marazzi, Giuseppe, Pelliccia, Francesco, Campolongo, Giuseppe, Quattrino, Silvia, Cacciotti, Luca, Volterrani, Maurizio, Gaudio, Carlo, Rosano, Giuseppe·2015·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Statins are extensively used to treat dyslipidemia, but, because of their low tolerability profile, they are discontinued in a significant proportion of patients. Ezetimibe and nutraceuticals have been introduced as alternative therapies and have proved to be effective and well tolerated. A single-blind, single-center, randomized, prospective, and parallel group trial comparing a combination of nutraceuticals (red yeast rice, policosanol, berberine, folic acid, coenzyme Q10 and astaxanthin), called Armolipid Plus, and ezetimibe for 3 months in terms of efficacy and tolerability. Patients who did not achieve their therapeutic target (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dl) could add the alternative treatment on top of randomized treatment for another 12 months: 100 patients who are dyslipidemic with ischemic heart disease treated with percutaneous coronary intervention were enrolled (ezetimibe n = 50, nutraceutical n = 50). Efficacy (lipid profile) and tolerability (adverse events, transaminases, and creatine kinase) were assessed after 3 and 12 months. After 3 months, 14 patients in the nutraceutical group achieved their therapeutic target, whereas none of the patients in the ezetimibe group did. At 1-year follow-up, 58 patients (72.5%) of the combined therapy group (n = 86) and 14 (100%) of the nutraceutical group reached the therapeutic goal. No patients experienced important undesirable effects. In conclusion, nutraceuticals alone or in combination with ezetimibe are well tolerated and improve the lipid profile in statin-intolerant patients with coronary heart disease. Further studies are needed to assess long-term effects of nutraceuticals on mortality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.09.023

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ezetimibe efficacy has been improved by the association with RYR, policosanol, and berberine.

    “Ezetimibe efficacy has been improved by the association with RYR, policosanol, and berberine [108, 109]”
  • In a single-blind randomized trial of 100 statin-intolerant PCI patients not at target, after 3 months 14 (28%) in the nutraceutical group reached target versus 0 in the ezetimibe group.

    “After 3 months, compared with 0 patients in the ezetimibe group, 14 patients (28%) in the nutraceutical group achieved their therapeutic target.”

    From The Role of Nutraceuticals in Statin Intolerant Patients (2018) · cites this paper as [144]

  • In both groups, LDL-C, TC, and TG fell significantly from baseline and HDL-C rose significantly.

    “values progressively and significantly decreased from baseline throughout treatment (p < 0.001 for all), whereas HDL-C (40 Æ 7 mg/dl [1.03 Æ 0.18 mmol/l] vs. 41 Æ 8 mg/dl [1.06 Æ 0.21 mmol/l]) values progressively and significantly increased in both groups (p < 0.001) (144).”

    From The Role of Nutraceuticals in Statin Intolerant Patients (2018) · cites this paper as [144]

  • At 1 year, 58 (72.5%) of the combined therapy group and 14 (100%) of the nutraceutical group reached the therapeutic goal.

    “At 1-year follow-up, 58 patients (72.5%) of the combined therapy group (n ¼ 86) and 14 (100%) of the nutraceutical group reached the therapeutic goal (144).”

    From The Role of Nutraceuticals in Statin Intolerant Patients (2018) · cites this paper as [144]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 48

Authors
Marazzi, G., Pelliccia, F., Campolongo, G., Quattrino, S., Cacciotti, L., Volterrani, M., Gaudio, C., & Rosano, G.
Affiliations
  • IRCCS San Raffaele Roma (IT)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT)
Corresponding author
Marazzi, Giuseppe
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
116
Issue
12
Pages
1798-1801
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1836683183
Cited by
48
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Natural Products and Biological Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Keywords
nutraceuticals, ezetimibe, statin intolerance, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, LDL cholesterol lowering, red yeast rice, policosanol, berberine, folic acid, coenzyme Q10, astaxanthin, percutaneous coronary intervention, lipid profile, tolerability
MeSH terms
Ezetimibe, Cholesterol, Coronary Artery Disease, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Dietary Supplements, Dyslipidemias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review