Cited by 22Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Sinus Node Sparing Novel Hybrid Approach for Treatment of Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia/Postural Orthostatic Sinus Tachycardia With New Electrophysiological Finding

de Asmundis, Carlo, Chierchia, Gian-Battista, Sieira, Juan, Ströker, Erwin, Umbrain, Vincent, Poelaert, Jan, Brugada, Pedro, La Meir, Mark·2019·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

The ideal treatment of Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia (IST) and Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) still needs to be defined. Medical treatment yields suboptimal results, endocardial ablation of the sinus node (SN) may risk phrenic nerve damage and open heart surgery may be accompanied by unjustified invasive risks. We describe our first experience of 50 consecutive patients (41 females, 22.83 ± 3.91 years) having undergone a novel hybrid thoracoscopic ablation for drug resistant IST (n = 39, 78%) or POTS (n = 11, 22%). The SN was identified with the help of 3D mapping. Surgery was performed through 3 (5 mm) ports from the right side. A minimally invasive approach with a radio frequency bipolar clamp was utilized to a new target sparing the SN region, to isolate the superior and the inferior caval veins, and a crista terminalis line was made. All lines were interconnected. Normal SR was restored in all patients at the end of the procedure. All patients discontinued medication during the follow-up. After a blanking period of 6 months all patients presented stable SR. At a mean of 28.4 ± 1.2 months, normal SN ruction and chronotropic response to exercise was present. In the 11 patients initially diagnosed with POTS, no syncope occurred. During the follow-up, pericarditis was the most common complication (39 patients; 78%) with complete resolution in all cases. In conclusions the preliminary results of our first experience with a SN sparing novel hybrid ablation o…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.04.019

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Asmundis, C., Chierchia, G.-B., Sieira, J., Ströker, E., Umbrain, V., Poelaert, J., Brugada, P., & La Meir, M.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
124
Issue
2
Pages
224-232
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2942165467
Cited by
22
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
inappropriate sinus tachycardia, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, thoracoscopic ablation, hybrid ablation, 3D electroanatomical mapping, crista terminalis, pericarditis, sinus node recovery
MeSH terms
Endocardium, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Sinoatrial Node, Tachycardia, Sinus, Treatment Outcome, Catheter Ablation, Body Surface Potential Mapping, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review