Cited by 136Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsHeart rate and cardiovascular health

A multivariate model for predicting mortality in patients with heart failure and systolic dysfunction

Brophy, James M, Dagenais, Gilles R, McSherry, Frances, Williford, William, Yusuf, Salim·2004·The American Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Background Heart failure is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, but there are no reliable models based on readily available clinical variables to predict outcomes in patients taking angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors.Methods A multivariate statistical model to predict mortality was developed in a random sample (n = 4277 patients [67%]) of the 6422 patients enrolled in the Digitalis Investigation Group trial who had a depressed ejection fraction (<or=45%), were in sinus rhythm, and were taking ACE inhibitors. The model was then validated in the remaining 2145 patients.Results Total mortality in the derivation sample was 11.2% (n = 480) at 12 months and 29.9% (n = 1277) at 36 months. Lower ejection fraction, worse renal function, cardiomegaly, worse functional class, signs or symptoms of heart failure, lower blood pressure, and lower body mass index were associated with reduced 12-month survival. This model provided good predictions of mortality in the verification sample. The same variables, along with age and the baseline use of nitrates, were also predictive of 36-month mortality.Conclusion Routine clinical variables can be used to predict short- and long-term mortality in patients with heart failure and systolic dysfunction who are treated with ACE inhibitors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.09.035

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 136

Authors
Brophy, J. M., Dagenais, G. R., McSherry, F., Williford, W., & Yusuf, S.
Affiliations
  • McGill University Health Centre (CA)
  • Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (CA)
  • Perry Point VA Medical Center (US)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Brophy, James M
Venue
The American Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-03
Volume
116
Issue
5
Pages
300-304
ISSN
0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001672181
Cited by
136
References
29
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart rate and cardiovascular health
Keywords
heart failure, systolic dysfunction, mortality prediction, ACE inhibitors, Digitalis Investigation Group trial, ejection fraction, renal function, cardiomegaly, functional class, blood pressure, body mass index, nitrate, prognostic model
MeSH terms
Aged, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Cardiotonic Agents, Digoxin, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Stroke Volume, Systole, Models, Statistical, Survival Rate, Multivariate Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review