Prevalence and outcomes of anemia in cancer: a systematic review of the literature
Abstract
Anemia is common in patients with cancer. This systematic literature review of reports published in 1966 through February 2003 identified the prevalence of anemia in specific cancers and assessed the impact of anemia on survival and quality of life (QOL). Studies about chemotherapy-induced anemia were excluded. Anemia prevalence varied widely; most studies found that between 30% and 90% of patients with cancer had anemia. Prevalence was affected strongly by the definition of anemia: 7% of patients with Hodgkin disease had anemia when the condition was defined as a hemoglobin level <90.0 g/L; as many as 86% of patients had anemia when it was defined as a hemoglobin value <110.0 g/L. Prevalence varied by cancer type and disease stage: 40% of patients with early-stage colon tumors and nearly 80% of patients with advanced disease had anemia. Patients with anemia had poorer survival and local tumor control than did their nonanemic counterparts in 15 of 18 studies. In 8 of 12 studies, patients without anemia (most treated with epoetin) needed fewer transfusions. QOL was positively correlated with hemoglobin levels in 15 of 16 studies. There was no significant difference in treatment toxicity between patients with and without anemia. Tumor hypoxia, which has been associated with resistance to radiation therapy and chemotherapy, may stimulate angiogenesis, leading to poor local control of tumors and increased morbidity and mortality. Treatment of anemia may have a significant impact on patient survival and QOL. However, a standard definition of anemia is needed, as is research about the effect of anemia on cancer progression.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The metabolic syndrome is associated with greater risk for cardiovascular disease, but once type 2 diabetes mellitus emerges, cardiovascular risk increases even more.
“Several recent reports show that the metabolic syndrome is associated with greater risk for cardiovascular disease, [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73] but once type 2 diabetes mellitus emerges, cardiovascular risk increases even more.74”
From Diagnosis and Management of the Metabolic Syndrome: An American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement (2005) · cites this paper as [74]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 144 · Cited by 878
- Authors
- Knight, K., Wade, S., & Balducci, L.
- Affiliations
- Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Knight, Kevin
- Venue
- The American Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 11-26
- ISSN
- 0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2024159843
- Cited by
- 878
- References
- 144
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 3.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Blood transfusion and management
- Keywords
- anemia prevalence, survival, quality of life, hemoglobin threshold, Hodgkin's disease, colon cancer, tumor hypoxia, angiogenesis, epoetin, blood transfusion, treatment toxicity, local tumor control
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Anemia, Blood Transfusion, Erythropoietin, Health Status, Hemoglobins, Humans, Neoplasm Staging, Neoplasms, Prognosis, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index, Comorbidity, Incidence, Prevalence, Survival Analysis, Patient Satisfaction, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Disease Progression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review