Cited by 878Erythropoietin and Anemia TreatmentIron Metabolism and DisordersBlood transfusion and management

Prevalence and outcomes of anemia in cancer: a systematic review of the literature

Knight, Kevin, Wade, Sally, Balducci, Lodovico·2004·The American Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Anemia is common in patients with cancer. This systematic literature review of reports published in 1966 through February 2003 identified the prevalence of anemia in specific cancers and assessed the impact of anemia on survival and quality of life (QOL). Studies about chemotherapy-induced anemia were excluded. Anemia prevalence varied widely; most studies found that between 30% and 90% of patients with cancer had anemia. Prevalence was affected strongly by the definition of anemia: 7% of patients with Hodgkin disease had anemia when the condition was defined as a hemoglobin level <90.0 g/L; as many as 86% of patients had anemia when it was defined as a hemoglobin value <110.0 g/L. Prevalence varied by cancer type and disease stage: 40% of patients with early-stage colon tumors and nearly 80% of patients with advanced disease had anemia. Patients with anemia had poorer survival and local tumor control than did their nonanemic counterparts in 15 of 18 studies. In 8 of 12 studies, patients without anemia (most treated with epoetin) needed fewer transfusions. QOL was positively correlated with hemoglobin levels in 15 of 16 studies. There was no significant difference in treatment toxicity between patients with and without anemia. Tumor hypoxia, which has been associated with resistance to radiation therapy and chemotherapy, may stimulate angiogenesis, leading to poor local control of tumors and increased morbidity and mortality. Treatment of anemia may have a significant impact on patient survival and QOL. However, a standard definition of anemia is needed, as is research about the effect of anemia on cancer progression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.12.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 144 · Cited by 878

Authors
Knight, K., Wade, S., & Balducci, L.
Affiliations
Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Knight, Kevin
Venue
The American Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-04
Volume
116
Issue
7
Pages
11-26
ISSN
0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024159843
Cited by
878
References
144
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 41
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Blood transfusion and management
Keywords
anemia prevalence, survival, quality of life, hemoglobin threshold, Hodgkin's disease, colon cancer, tumor hypoxia, angiogenesis, epoetin, blood transfusion, treatment toxicity, local tumor control
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Anemia, Blood Transfusion, Erythropoietin, Health Status, Hemoglobins, Humans, Neoplasm Staging, Neoplasms, Prognosis, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index, Comorbidity, Incidence, Prevalence, Survival Analysis, Patient Satisfaction, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review