Cited by 237Cardiac Health and Mental HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiologyDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

The obesity paradox, weight loss, and coronary disease

Open access
Lavie, Carl J., Milani, Richard V., Artham, Surya M., Patel, Dharmendrakumar A., Ventura, Hector O.·2009·The American Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Purpose Because obesity is a cardiovascular risk factor but is associated with a more favorable prognosis among cohorts of cardiac patients, we assessed this "obesity paradox" in overweight and obese patients with coronary heart disease enrolled in a cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training (CRET) program, making this assessment in patients classified as overweight/obese using both traditional body mass index (BMI) and percent body fat assessments. Additionally, we assessed the efficacy and safety of purposeful weight loss in overweight and obese coronary patients.Patients and methods We retrospectively studied 529 consecutive CRET patients following major coronary events before and after CRET, and compared baseline and post program data in 393 overweight and obese patients (body mass index [BMI] > or =25 kg/m(2)) divided by median weight change (median=-1.5%; mean +2% vs -5%, respectively). In addition, we assessed 3-year total mortality in various baseline BMI categories as well as compared mortality in those with high baseline percent fat (>25% in men and >35% in women) versus those with low baseline fat.Results Following CRET, the overweight and obese with greater weight loss had improvements in BMI (-5%; P <.0001), percent fat (-8%; P <.0001), peak oxygen consumption (+16%; P <.0001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-5%; P <.02), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (+10%; P <.0001), triglycerides (-17%; P <.0001), C-reactive protein (-40%; P <.0001), and fasting glucose (-4%; P=.02), as well as marked improvements in behavioral factors and quality-of-life scores. Those with lower weight loss had no significant improvements in percent fat, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, C-reactive protein, and fasting glucose. During 3-year follow-up, overall mortality trended only slightly lower in those with baseline overweightness/obesity who had more weight loss (3.1% vs 5.1%; P=.30). However, total mortality was considerably lower in the baseline overweight/obese (BMI > or =25 kg/m(2)) than in 136 CRET patients with baseline BMI <25 kg/m(2) (4.1% vs 13.2%; P <.001), as well as in those with high baseline fat compared with those with low fat (3.8% vs 10.6%; P <.01).Conclusions Purposeful weight loss with CRET in overweight/obese coronary patients is associated with only a nonsignificant trend for lower mortality but is characterized by marked improvements in obesity indices, exercise capacity, plasma lipids, and inflammation, as well as behavioral factors and quality of life. Although an "obesity paradox" exists using either baseline BMI or baseline percent fat criteria, these results support the safety and potential long-term benefits of purposeful weight loss in overweight and obese patients with coronary heart disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.06.006

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In that 530-patient study, the weight-loss group had a trend toward lower mortality.

    “In a study of 530 patients, we noted marked improvements in CHD risk factors among overweight and obese CHD patients who lost weight, including CRP, lipids, and glucose, and this group had a trend of lower mortality (48).”

    From Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease (2009) · cites this paper as [48]

  • In a 530-patient study, overweight and obese coronary heart disease patients who lost weight showed marked improvements in CRP, lipids, and glucose.

    “In a study of 530 patients, we noted marked improvements in CHD risk factors among overweight and obese CHD patients who lost weight, including CRP, lipids, and glucose, and this group had a trend of lower mortality (48).”

    From Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease (2009) · cites this paper as [48]

  • Active Tsimane with BMI>25 may instead be "fit and fat".

    “Active Tsimane with BMI>25 may instead be “fit and fat” [63].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 69 · Cited by 237

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lavie CJ, Milani RV, Ventura HO. Obesity and cardiovascular dis- ease-risk factor, paradox, and impact of weight loss. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1925-1932.

Authors
Lavie, C. J., Milani, R. V., Artham, S. M., Patel, D. A., & Ventura, H. O.
Affiliations
Ochsner Health System (US)
Corresponding author
Lavie, Carl J.
Venue
The American Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
122
Issue
12
Pages
1106-1114
ISSN
0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057369974
Cited by
237
References
69
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 18
FWCI
15.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ochsner Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
obesity paradox, coronary artery disease, weight loss, cardiac rehabilitation, exercise training, body mass index, body fat percentage, mortality, cardiovascular risk factors, lipid profile, C-reactive protein, peak oxygen uptake, quality of life, overweight patients, prognosis after myocardial infarction, stroke prevention, quality of life after myocardial infarction, quality of life after stroke
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Glucose, C-Reactive Protein, Coronary Disease, Female, Humans, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen Consumption, Quality of Life, Retrospective Studies, Weight Loss, Exercise, Body Mass Index, Exercise Tolerance, Overweight, Body Fat Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review