Cited by 30Electronic Health Records SystemsMedical Coding and Health InformationNursing Diagnosis and Documentation

Copy and Paste of Electronic Health Records: A Modern Medical Illness

Open access
Markel, Arie·2010·The American Journal of Medicine

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.10.012

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prevalence of duplicate information in EHRs due to copy-pasting, templating, and summarizing is a major barrier to finding relevant information from EHRs.

    “The prevalence of duplicate information in EHRs due to copy-pasting, templating, and summarizing is a major barrier to finding relevant information from EHRs79,80.”

    From Social determinants of health extraction from clinical notes across institutions using large language models (2025) · cites this paper as [80]

    In the unpaginated main text, Markel describes copied information repeatedly filling charts, sometimes leaving the reader unable to understand the data while relevant current history receives little space. This supports the barrier attributed to copy-pasting. The paper does not identify templating or summarizing as causes, and its examples from one medical center do not establish EHR-wide prevalence. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 1 · Cited by 30

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Siegler EL, Adelman R. Copy and paste: a remediable hazard of elec- tronic health records. Am J Med. 2009;122:495-496. 0002-9343/$ -see front matter © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors
Markel, A.
Affiliations
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
Corresponding author
Markel, Arie
Venue
The American Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
123
Issue
5
Pages
e9
ISSN
0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075137165
Cited by
30
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Keywords
copy and paste, electronic health records, clinical documentation, history of present illness, medical errors, internal medicine residency training, medical records review, discharge summaries, medical education reform, patient safety
MeSH terms
Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review