Association between social isolation and left ventricular mass
Open accessAbstract
Background Social isolation is associated with progression of cardiovascular disease, with the most socially isolated patients being at increased risk. Increased left ventricular mass is a predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. It is not yet clear whether social isolation is a determinant of increased left ventricular mass.Methods We performed a cross-sectional study of Northern Manhattan Study participants who were free of clinical cardiovascular disease and had obtained transthoracic echocardiograms (n=2021) and a baseline questionnaire on social habits. Social isolation was defined as the lack of friendship networks (knowing fewer than 3 people well enough to visit within their homes). Echocardiographic left ventricular mass was indexed to height(2.7), analyzed as a continuous variable and compared between exposure groups.Results The prevalence of social isolation was 13.5%. The average left ventricular mass was significantly higher (50.2 gm/m(2.7)) in those who were, as compared with those who were not (47.6 gm/m(2.7)), socially isolated (P<.05). Higher prevalence of social isolation was found among those less educated, uninsured, or unemployed. There were no significant race-ethnic differences in the prevalence of social isolation. In multivariate analysis, there was a trend toward an association between social isolation and increased left ventricular mass in the total cohort (P=.09). Among Hispanics, social isolation was significantly associated with greater left ventricular mass. Hispanics who were socially isolated averaged 3.9 gm/ht(2.7) higher left ventricular mass compared with those not socially isolated (P=.002). This relationship was not present among non-Hispanic blacks or whites.Conclusion In this urban tri-ethnic cohort, social isolation was prevalent and associated with indices of low socioeconomic status. Hispanics who were socially isolated had a greater risk for increased left ventricular mass.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A US study found that Hispanic respondents who were socially isolated had a greater risk of increased left ventricular mass compared to isolated older people from other ethnic backgrounds.
“For example, a US study found that Hispanic respondents who were socially isolated had a greater risk of increased left ventricular mass compared to isolated older people from other ethnic backgrounds (Rodriguez et al. 2011).”
From Social isolation, loneliness and health in old age: a scoping review (2017) · cites this paper as Rodriguez et al. 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 24
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [13]McPherson M Smith-Lovin L MEB Social Isolation in America American Sociological Review 2006 71 353 75
- [21]Boden-Albala B Sacco RL Socio-Cultural Determinants of Stroke in a Multiethnic Community: Findings from the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study Annals of Epidemiology 2004
- [29]Park SH Shub C Nobrega TP Bailey KR Seward JB Two-Dimensional Echocardiographic Calculation of Left Ventricular Mass as Recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography: Correlation with Autopsy and M-Mode Echocardiography J Am SocEchocardiogr 1996 9 119 28 8849607
- Authors
- Rodriguez, C. J., Elkind, M. S. V., Clemow, L., Jin, Z., Di Tullio, M., Sacco, R. L., Homma, S., & Boden-Albala, B.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- University of Miami (US)
- Venue
- The American Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 164-170
- ISSN
- 0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3064505
- OpenAlex
- W2030442670
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
- Montana Department of Transportation (K24 NS02241)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23 HL079343-01A2)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Keywords
- social isolation, left ventricular mass, cardiovascular risk, friendship networks, socioeconomic status, Hispanic Americans, Northern Manhattan Study, urban population, cardiovascular morbidity
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Black or African American, Cross-Sectional Studies, Echocardiography, Educational Status, Family, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New York City, Regression Analysis, Research Design, Risk Factors, Social Class, Social Isolation, Unemployment, Urban Population, Multivariate Analysis, Medically Uninsured, Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular, White People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review