Cited by 552Bone health and osteoporosis researchMenopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

Obesity Is Not Protective against Fracture in Postmenopausal Women: GLOW

Open access
Compston, Juliet E., Watts, Nelson B., Chapurlat, Roland, Cooper, Cyrus, Boonen, Steven, Greenspan, Susan, Pfeilschifter, Johannes, Silverman, Stuart +13 more·2011·The American Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Objective To investigate the prevalence and incidence of clinical fractures in obese, postmenopausal women enrolled in the Global Longitudinal study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW).Methods This was a multinational, prospective, observational, population-based study carried out by 723 physician practices at 17 sites in 10 countries. A total of 60,393 women aged ≥ 55 years were included. Data were collected using self-administered questionnaires that covered domains that included patient characteristics, fracture history, risk factors for fracture, and anti-osteoporosis medications.Results Body mass index (BMI) and fracture history were available at baseline and at 1 and 2 years in 44,534 women, 23.4% of whom were obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2)). Fracture prevalence in obese women at baseline was 222 per 1000 and incidence at 2 years was 61.7 per 1000, similar to rates in nonobese women (227 and 66.0 per 1000, respectively). Fractures in obese women accounted for 23% and 22% of all previous and incident fractures, respectively. The risk of incident ankle and upper leg fractures was significantly higher in obese than in nonobese women, while the risk of wrist fracture was significantly lower. Obese women with fracture were more likely to have experienced early menopause and to report 2 or more falls in the past year. Self-reported asthma, emphysema, and type 1 diabetes were all significantly more common in obese than nonobese women with incident fracture. At 2 years, 27% of obese women with incident fracture were receiving bone protective therapy, compared with 41% of nonobese and 57% of underweight women.Conclusions Our results demonstrate that obesity is not protective against fracture in postmenopausal women and is associated with increased risk of ankle and upper leg fractures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.06.013

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Obesity may increase fracture risk through bone quality or frailty independently of bone mineral density.

    “Obesity is inversely related to BMD and fractures313 but might increase the fracture risk through bone quality314,315 or frailty132,316 independent of BMD.”

    From Sarcopenic obesity in older adults: aetiology, epidemiology and treatment strategies (2018) · cites this paper as [315]

    The Discussion reports more falls and several markers of frailty among obese women with fractures, and suggests these may help explain their fracture risk. It also cautions that higher BMD may not confer greater bone strength, but it does not establish that frailty increases fracture risk independently of BMD. The bone-quality portion of the citing sentence has separate citations. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Obese patients may have increased fracture risk, especially at peripheral sites.

    “While data are limited, obese patients may be at increased fracture risk, particularly at peripheral sites24-27.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 552

Authors
Compston, J. E., Watts, N. B., Chapurlat, R., Cooper, C., Boonen, S., Greenspan, S., Pfeilschifter, J., Silverman, S., Díez-Pérez, A., Lindsay, R., Saag, K. G., Netelenbos, J. C., Gehlbach, S., Hooven, F. H., Flahive, J., Adachi, J. D., Rossini, M., LaCroix, A. Z., Roux, C., Sambrook, P. N., & Siris, E. S.
Affiliations
  • Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Southampton General Hospital (GB)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Alfried Krupp Hospital (DE)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • Helen Hayes Hospital (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of Verona (IT)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
  • Hôpital Cochin (FR)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Compston, Juliet E.
Venue
The American Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
124
Issue
11
Pages
1043-1050
ISSN
0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016253728
Cited by
552
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 26
FWCI
39.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Sanofi
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0508-10082)
  • NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG024827)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
obesity, postmenopausal women, fracture risk, osteoporosis, ankle fractures, wrist fractures, body mass index, falls, asthma, emphysema, type 1 diabetes, anti-osteoporotic therapy, fracture incidence
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Obesity, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Thinness, Cohort Studies, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, Comorbidity, Body Mass Index, Incidence, Bone Density Conservation Agents, Osteoporotic Fractures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review