Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Acute Porphyrias in the USA: Features of 108 Subjects from Porphyrias Consortium

Open access
Bonkovsky, Herbert L., Maddukuri, Vinaya C., Yazici, Cemal, Anderson, Karl E., Bissell, D. Montgomery, Bloomer, Joseph R., Phillips, John D., Naik, Hetanshi, Peter, Inga, Baillargeon, Gwen, Bossi, Krista, Gandolfo, Laura, Light, Carrie, Bishop, David, Desnick, Robert J.·2014·The American Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Background Recent descriptions of the clinical and laboratory features of subjects with acute porphyrias in the US are lacking. Our aim was to describe clinical, biochemical and genetic features of 108 subjects. Methods Between Sep 2010—Dec 2012, 108 subjects with acute porphyrias [90 acute intermittent porphyria, 9 hereditary coproporphyria, 9 variegate porphyria] were enrolled into an observational study. Genetic testing was performed at a central genetic testing laboratory and clinical information entered into a central data base. Selected features were compared to data for adults in the USA. Results Most subjects [88/108, 81%] were female with self-reported onset of symptoms in 2nd–4th decades of life. The most common symptom was abdominal pain. Appendectomies and cholecystectomies were common prior to a diagnosis of porphyria. The diagnosis was delayed by a mean of 15 years. Anxiety and depression were common, and 18% complained of chronic symptoms, especially neuropathic and other pains. The incidences of and systemic arterial hypertension, chronic kidney disease, seizure disorders, and psychiatric conditions were markedly increased. Mutations of the known causative genes were found in 102/105 of those tested, with novel mutations being found in 37 including in 7/8 subjects with hereditary coproporphyria. Therapy with intravenous hematin was the most effective therapy both for treatment of acute attacks and for prevention of recurrent attacks. Conclusions Acute porphyrias often remain undiagnosed for more than a decade after first symptoms develop. Intravenous hematin is the treatment of choice, both for treatment of acute attacks and for prevention of recurrent attacks. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01561157

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.06.036

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Bonkovsky, H. L., Maddukuri, V. C., Yazici, C., Anderson, K. E., Bissell, D. M., Bloomer, J. R., Phillips, J. D., Naik, H., Peter, I., Baillargeon, G., Bossi, K., Gandolfo, L., Light, C., Bishop, D., & Desnick, R. J.
Venue
The American Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
127
Issue
12
Pages
1233-1241
ISSN
0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974125090
Cited by
264
References
0
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acute Porphyrias in the USA: Features of 108 Subjects from Porphyrias Consortium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.06.036
The paper
Bonkovsky, H. L., Maddukuri, V. C., Yazici, C., Anderson, K. E., Bissell, D. M., Bloomer, J. R., Phillips, J. D., Naik, H., Peter, I., Baillargeon, G., Bossi, K., Gandolfo, L., Light, C., Bishop, D., & Desnick, R. J. (2014). Acute Porphyrias in the USA: Features of 108 Subjects from Porphyrias Consortium. The American Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.06.036

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.