Cited by 85Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesPharmaceutical studies and practices

FDA drug safety communications: a narrative review and clinical considerations for older adults

Open access
Marcum, Zachary A., Vande Griend, Joseph P., Linnebur, Sunny A.·2012·The American Journal of Geriatric Pharmacotherapy

Abstract

Background The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has new regulatory authorities intended to enhance drug safety monitoring in the postmarketing period. This has resulted in an increase in communication from the FDA in recent years about the safety profile of certain drugs. It is important to stay abreast of the current literature on drug risks to effectively communicate these risks to patients, other health care providers, and the general public.Objective To summarize 4 new FDA drug safety communications by describing the evidence supporting the risks and the clinical implications for older adults.Methods The FDA Web site was reviewed for new drug safety communications from May 2011 to April 2012 that would be relevant to older adults. Approved labeling for each drug or class was obtained from the manufacturer, and PubMed was searched for primary literature that supported the drug safety concern.Results FDA drug safety communications for 4 drugs were chosen because of the potential clinical importance in older adults. A warning for citalopram was made because of potential problems with QT prolongation in patients taking less than 40 mg per day. The evidence suggests minor changes in QT interval. Given the flat dose-response curve in treating depression with citalopram, the new 20-mg/d maximum dose in older adults is sensible. Another warning was made for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and an increased risk of Clostridium difficile infection. A dose-response relationship was found for this drug risk. With C. difficile infections on the rise in older adults, along with other safety risks of PPI therapy, PPIs should only be used in older adults indicated for therapy for the shortest duration possible. In addition, a warning about dabigatran was made. There is strong evidence from a large clinical trial, as well as case reports, of increased bleeding risk in older adults taking dabigatran, especially in older adults with decreased renal function. This medication should be used with caution in older adults. Finally, several warnings were made about statins. Routine periodic monitoring of liver enzymes does not appear to be effective in detecting or preventing serious liver injury from statin use; thus, liver enzymes are no longer recommended to be routinely monitored. Statin-induced cognitive changes are rare, and insufficient evidence is currently available to establish causality. Statins appear to moderately increase the risk of developing diabetes (versus placebo), and regular screening for diabetes should be considered, especially for patients taking high-dose statins and patients with multiple risk factors for diabetes.Conclusion FDA drug safety communications incorporate complex methodologies that investigate the risks (and relative benefits) of medication therapy. Clinicians caring for older adults need to be aware of the most current evidence behind these drug risks to effectively communicate with and care for their patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2012.05.002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For dementia, hepatic steatosis, venous thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation, and polycystic ovary syndrome, no effect of statins has been reliably demonstrated.

    “Other conditions, such as dementia [224], hepatic steatosis [225], venous thromboembolism [226], atrial fibrillation [227,228], and polycystic ovary syndrome [229] have also been studied, and no effect of statins on these conditions has been reliably demonstrated.”
  • Progression to liver failure is exceedingly rare, and therefore routine monitoring of alanine aminotransferase during statin treatment is no longer recommended.

    “Progression to liver failure is exceedingly rare, therefore routine monitoring of ALT during statin treatment is no longer recommended. 221”

    From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [221]

  • Progression to liver failure during statin treatment is exceedingly rare.

    “Progression to liver failure is exceedingly rare, therefore routine monitoring of ALT during statin treatment is no longer recommended.221”

    From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [221]

  • Recent reviews are encouraging about the safety of long-term statin therapy.

    “Recent reviews are encouraging about the safety of long-term statin therapy.221,222”

    From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [221]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 85

Authors
Marcum, Z. A., Vande Griend, J. P., & Linnebur, S. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
Corresponding author
Marcum, Zachary A.
Venue
The American Journal of Geriatric Pharmacotherapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
264-271
ISSN
1543-5946 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024038305
Cited by
85
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Geriatric Pharmacotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (P30AG024827)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
post-marketing surveillance, older adults, citalopram, QT prolongation, proton pump inhibitors, Clostridium difficile infection, dabigatran, bleeding risk, statins, statin-induced liver injury, statin-induced diabetes, drug safety warnings, renal function, depression treatment, dose-response relationship
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Health Services for the Aged, Humans, Product Surveillance, Postmarketing, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Prescription Drugs, Health Communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review