Cited by 28Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesSinusitis and nasal conditions

Relationship between allergic rhinitis and nasal surgery success in patients with obstructive sleep apnea

Kim, Sung-Dong, Jung, Da-Woon, Lee, Jung-Woo, Park, Ji-Hwan, Mun, Sue-Jean, Cho, Kyu-Sup·2021·American Journal of Otolaryngology

Abstract

Objectives Nasal obstruction is common in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Nonetheless, the effectiveness of isolated nasal surgery in treatment of OSA remains controversial. This study is to evaluate the subjective and objective outcome after isolated nasal surgery in patients with OSA and to determine the associated factors related to the success rate of isolated nasal surgery.Methods The study population consisted of 35 patients with nasal obstruction who had been diagnosed with OSA and were undergoing septoplasty and inferior turbinate reduction to correct nasal pathologies. Preoperative drug-induced sleep endoscopy was performed to evaluate the obstruction site. Patients were assessed before and after nasal surgery using subjective outcomes measures, including the Visual Analog Scale and Epworth Sleepiness Scale, as well as by overnight polysomnography.Results All patients experienced improved nasal breathing postoperatively. At 6 months postoperatively, patients exhibited significant symptomatic improvement in snoring, sleep apnea, morning headache, tiredness, and daytime sleepiness. Postoperative polysomnography revealed significant improvement in the apnea-hypopnea index, respiratory disturbance index, and percentage of time with oxygen saturation < 90%. Although the overall success rate of nasal surgery alone was 14.3%, the criteria for success were met in 50% of patients with allergic rhinitis. Furthermore, the success rate was significantly higher in patients with moderate to severe nasal obstruction than in patients with mild nasal obstruction.Conclusion Among patients with OSA, those with allergic rhinitis and severe nasal obstruction are likely to have a better surgical outcome following isolated nasal surgery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103079

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 28

Authors
Kim, S.-D., Jung, D.-W., Lee, J.-W., Park, J.-H., Mun, S.-J., & Cho, K.-S.
Affiliations
  • Pusan National University Hospital (KR)
  • Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital (KR)
Corresponding author
Cho, Kyu-Sup
Venue
American Journal of Otolaryngology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
103079
ISSN
0196-0709 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3159992583
Cited by
28
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Otolaryngology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, allergic rhinitis, nasal obstruction, septoplasty, inferior turbinate reduction, nasal surgery outcomes, drug-induced sleep endoscopy, apnea-hypopnea index, daytime sleepiness
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Endoscopy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nasal Septum, Nose, Prospective Studies, Respiration, Turbinates, Treatment Outcome, Polysomnography, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Young Adult, Patient Acuity, Rhinitis, Allergic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review