Examining the barriers to meaningful assessment and feedback in medical training
Abstract
Background Recent reports from both accreditation bodies in North America highlight problems with current assessment practices in postgraduate medical training. Previous work has shown that educators might be reluctant to report poor performance or fail underperforming trainees. This study explores the barriers perceived by medical educators to providing more meaningful assessment and feedback to trainees.Methods Semistructured interviews were conducted with 22 physician educators. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Three researchers analyzed the transcripts using a grounded theory approach.Results Participants expressed a reluctance to provide poor assessments or feedback to trainees. Fifty-five percent of the participants reported passing trainees who could have benefited from additional training. Our data revealed a number of barriers which may account for these findings. Implementing more frequent formative assessments could help educators more effectively evaluate trainees and provide feedback, although a shift in the culture of medicine may be required.Conclusion It is imperative that the barriers to effective assessment and feedback identified in this study be addressed to improve postgraduate medical training and enhance patient care.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The complexity of implementing effective formative assessment and feedback systems is amplified by the scale and diversity of medical education programs.
“The complexity of implementing effective formative assessment and feedback systems is further amplified by the scale and diversity of medical education programs [11].”
From Formative assessment and feedback in medical education: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 189 (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 81
- Authors
- McQueen, S. A., Petrisor, B., Bhandari, M., Fahim, C., McKinnon, V., & Sonnadara, R. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- McMaster University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Sonnadara, Ranil R.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-02
- Volume
- 211
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 464-475
- ISSN
- 0002-9610 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2143662742
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 2.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Keywords
- graduate medical education, medical education assessment, trainee feedback, barriers to assessment, physician educators, formative assessment, medical culture
- MeSH terms
- Formative Feedback, Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Canada, Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Female, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Male, General Surgery, Grounded Theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review