Marijuana use and outcomes in adult and pediatric trauma patients after legalization in California
Abstract
Background Marijuana has become legal in eight states since 2012. We hypothesized the incidence of marijuana-positive trauma patients and rate of mortality has increased post-legalization. Methods A single level-I trauma center was used to identify patients screening positive for marijuana on urine-toxicology. Patients in the pre-legalization and post-legalization periods were compared. Results In the pre-legalization cohort 9.4% were marijuana-positive versus 11.0% in the post-legalization cohort (p = 0.001). Marijuana-positive patients post-legalization had higher rates of critical trauma activation (20.0% vs. 15.0%, p = 0.01) and mortality (2.6% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.03). In the pediatric (age 12-17) subgroup, the incidence of marijuana-positive patients did not change after legalization (pre: 39.3%, post: 46.4%, p = 0.24). Conclusion The incidence of marijuana-positive trauma patients increased post-legalization. Adult marijuana-positive trauma patients post-legalization were more likely to meet criteria for critical trauma activation and have a higher mortality rate. A subgroup of pediatric patients had an alarmingly high rate of marijuana use. Summary The rate of marijuana use among trauma patients increased post-legalization in California. The rate of critical trauma activation also increased as well as the mortality rate.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The empirical literature suggests RCL is associated with increased cannabis-related emergency visits and other health consequences (eg, trauma-related cases).
“In terms of health outcomes, the empirical literature suggests RCL is associated with increased cannabis-related emergency visits24,67,70,76 and other health consequences (eg, trauma-related cases 57 ).”
From The Impact of Recreational Cannabis Legalization on Cannabis Use and Associated Outcomes: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [57]
Cites
Does increasing the beer tax reduce marijuana consumption?
Pacula, R. L. (1998) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/s0167-6296(97)00039-8 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Bernstein, E., Edwards, E., Dorfman, D., Heeren, T., Bliss, C., & Bernstein, J. (2009) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00490.x · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Farrelly, K. N., Wardell, J. D., Marsden, E., Scarfe, M. L., Najdzionek, P., Turna, J., & MacKillop, J. (2023) · Substance Abuse Research and Treatment · doi:10.1177/11782218231172054 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
- Authors
- Grigorian, A., Lester, E., Lekawa, M., Figueroa, C., Kuza, C. M., Dolich, M., Schubl, S. D., Barrios, C., & Nahmias, J.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Grigorian, A.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 218
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1189-1194
- ISSN
- 0002-9610 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2972833646
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 3.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
- Keywords
- cannabis use, cannabis legalization, trauma patients, trauma mortality, pediatric trauma, urine toxicology
- MeSH terms
- Marijuana Use, Adolescent, Adult, California, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Registries, Trauma Centers, Wounds and Injuries, Incidence, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review