L’accès à l’aide médicale à mourir pour les personnes souffrant de troubles mentaux
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Excluding people living with mental disorders from eligibility for MAiD-MD is seen as an obstacle to their right to die with dignity.
“On the other hand, excluding these people from eligibility for MAiD-MD is seen as an obstacle to their right to die with dignity [18].”
From Medical assistance in dying for people living with mental disorders: a qualitative thematic review (2023) · cites this paper as [18]
MAiD-MD can bring some peace of mind by offering an exit option to people who fear that their suffering will be perpetual.
“Although MAiD-MD can bring some peace of mind [18, 20, 21] by offering an exit option to people who fear that their suffering will be perpetual [22]”
From Medical assistance in dying for people living with mental disorders: a qualitative thematic review (2023) · cites this paper as [18]
Our findings do not support the claim that clinicians can rely on existing statistical and staging tools like the Maudsley Staging Method to predict chances of recovery in a person requesting psychiatric EAS.
“Second, our findings do not support the claim, made by some, that clinicians can rely on existing statistical and staging tools like the Maudsley Staging Method to predict chances of recovery in a person requesting psychiatric EAS (Provencher-Renaud, Larivée, & Sénéchal, 2019; Rooney et al., 2018; Tanner, 2018).”
From Irremediability in psychiatric euthanasia: examining the objective standard (2023) · cites this paper as Provencher-Renaud et al., 2019
Concerns remain about the societal responsibility to help people living with mental disorders live with their condition before considering helping them to die.
“However, concerns remain about the societal responsibility to help these people live with their condition before considering helping them to die [18, 19].”
From Medical assistance in dying for people living with mental disorders: a qualitative thematic review (2023) · cites this paper as [18]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 7
- Authors
- Provencher-Renaud, G., Larivée, S., & Sénéchal, C.
- Affiliations
- Université de Montréal (CA)
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Provencher-Renaud, Gabrielle
- ORCID
- Sénéchal, Carole
- Venue
- Annales Médico-psychologiques, revue psychiatrique
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 177
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 801-808
- ISSN
- 0003-4487 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2896821285
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annales Médico-psychologiques revue psychiatrique (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Keywords
- medical assistance in dying, assisted suicide, voluntary euthanasia, mental illness, Quebec, rational suicide, decision-making capacity, mental health, family involvement, Belgium, Netherlands
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review