Cited by 7Ethics and bioethics in healthcareHealth, Medicine and SocietyPalliative and Oncologic Care

L’accès à l’aide médicale à mourir pour les personnes souffrant de troubles mentaux

Provencher-Renaud, Gabrielle, Larivée, Serge, Sénéchal, Carole·2019·Annales Médico-psychologiques, revue psychiatrique

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amp.2018.08.022

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Excluding people living with mental disorders from eligibility for MAiD-MD is seen as an obstacle to their right to die with dignity.

    “On the other hand, excluding these people from eligibility for MAiD-MD is seen as an obstacle to their right to die with dignity [18].”
  • MAiD-MD can bring some peace of mind by offering an exit option to people who fear that their suffering will be perpetual.

    “Although MAiD-MD can bring some peace of mind [18, 20, 21] by offering an exit option to people who fear that their suffering will be perpetual [22]”
  • Our findings do not support the claim that clinicians can rely on existing statistical and staging tools like the Maudsley Staging Method to predict chances of recovery in a person requesting psychiatric EAS.

    “Second, our findings do not support the claim, made by some, that clinicians can rely on existing statistical and staging tools like the Maudsley Staging Method to predict chances of recovery in a person requesting psychiatric EAS (Provencher-Renaud, Larivée, & Sénéchal, 2019; Rooney et al., 2018; Tanner, 2018).”

    From Irremediability in psychiatric euthanasia: examining the objective standard (2023) · cites this paper as Provencher-Renaud et al., 2019

  • Concerns remain about the societal responsibility to help people living with mental disorders live with their condition before considering helping them to die.

    “However, concerns remain about the societal responsibility to help these people live with their condition before considering helping them to die [18, 19].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 7

Authors
Provencher-Renaud, G., Larivée, S., & Sénéchal, C.
Affiliations
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Provencher-Renaud, Gabrielle
Venue
Annales Médico-psychologiques, revue psychiatrique
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
177
Issue
8
Pages
801-808
ISSN
0003-4487 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2896821285
Cited by
7
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
closed
Locations
Annales Médico-psychologiques revue psychiatrique (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
medical assistance in dying, assisted suicide, voluntary euthanasia, mental illness, Quebec, rational suicide, decision-making capacity, mental health, family involvement, Belgium, Netherlands

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review