Cited by 14Second Language Acquisition and LearningEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningReading and Literacy Development

The influence of morphological knowledge on lexical processing and acquisition: The case of Arab EFL learners

Open access
Masrai, Ahmed M.·2016·Ampersand

Abstract

Although morphological knowledge has been proposed to enhance second language (L2) vocabulary acquisition, little is known about which morphological process has the greatest impact on lexical acquisition. To address this question, 400 school-learners of English from high schools in Saudi Arabia were presented with a morphological decomposition task of regular and irregular inflection and derivation, and an L2 vocabulary size test. The results indicated some significant levels of correlation between knowledge of regular inflection and derivation, and L2 vocabulary knowledge. Irregular inflection and derivation, on the contrary, were not found to have a significant effect on L2 vocabulary acquisition. Although significant correlations were observed between regular morphology and L2 vocabulary learning, regression analysis showed that only regular inflection processing has a sizable effect on vocabulary uptake. This variable explained about 38% of the variance per se. The findings also revealed no clear effect of the first language (L1) regularity of morphological rules, which apply extensively in Arabic, on acquiring words that are regular in English. The overall findings propose an explicit focus on teaching regular inflectional morphology in the language classroom because of its marked influence found on vocabulary acquisition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amper.2016.04.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This study's results correspond to previous research findings that word formation is key in developing spelling, grammar, vocabulary, and lexical processing and writing, and EFL learners with lexical competence score holistically in writing composition.

    “This study's results also correspond to previous research findings, which support the argument that word formation is key in developing spelling, grammar, vocabulary, and lexical processing and writing, and EFL learners with lexical competence score holistically in writing composition (Masrai, 2016;Karimi, 2013;Crossley and McNamara, 2012;Crossley and McNamara, 2009;Engber, 1995).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 43 · Cited by 14

Authors
Masrai, A. M.
Affiliations
Swansea University (GB)
Corresponding author
Masrai, Ahmed M.
Venue
Ampersand
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016
Volume
3
Pages
52-60
ISSN
2215-0390 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2341460352
Cited by
14
References
43
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Ampersand (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
morphological knowledge, lexical processing, second language vocabulary acquisition, English as a foreign language, Arabic learners of English, irregular morphology, morphological decomposition, morphology teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review