Archaea as emerging organisms in complex human microbiomes
Abstract
In this work, we review the state of knowledge of Archaea associated with the human microbiome. These prokaryotes, initially discovered in extreme environments, were named Archaea because these environments were thought to be the most primitive on Earth. Further research revealed that this terminology is misleading because these organisms were later found in various non-extreme environments, including the human host. Further examination of the human microbiome has enabled the isolation of three archaeal species, Methanobrevibacter smithii, Methanosphaera stadtmanae and Methanobrevibacter oralis, which are associated with oral, intestinal and vaginal mucosae in humans. Moreover, molecular studies including metagenomic analyses detected DNA sequences indicative of the presence of additional methanogenic and non-methanogenic Archaea in the human intestinal tract. All three culturable Archaea are strict anaerobes, although their potential role in human diseases remains to be established. Future research aims to detect and culture additional human mucosa-associated Archaea and to look for their presence in additional human tissues, to establish their role in human infections involving complex flora.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Periodontal disease severity is related to both modifiable (smoking, diet) and non-modifiable host risk factors (genetic susceptibility) as well as environmental factors.
“Periodontal disease severity is related to both modifiable (smoking, diet) and non-modifiable host risk factors (genetic susceptibility) as well as environmental factors [10,11,12].”
From A Cross-Talk between Diet and the Oral Microbiome: Balance of Nutrition on Inflammation and Immune System’s Response during Periodontitis (2022) · cites this paper as [12]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 86 · Cited by 190
- Authors
- Dridi, B., Raoult, D., & Drancourt, M.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Drancourt, Michel
- Venue
- Anaerobe
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 56-63
- ISSN
- 1075-9964 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972308191
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 1.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Anaerobe (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Keywords
- archaea, human microbiome, Methanobrevibacter smithii, Methanosphaera stadtmanae, Methanobrevibacter oralis, methanogenic archaea, oral mucosa, intestinal tract, vaginal mucosa, anaerobic archaea, complex infections, metagenomics
- MeSH terms
- Anaerobiosis, Female, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Mouth Mucosa, Vagina, Methanobacteriaceae, Methanobrevibacter, Biodiversity, Metagenome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review