Raven scavenging favours group foraging in wolves
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In areas away from anthropogenic resources, raven populations often rely on food subsidies provided by large predators, particularly in winter.
“In areas away from anthropogenic resources, raven populations often rely on food subsidies provided by large predators, particularly in winter, and ravens are ubiquitous scavengers at wolf kills throughout North America (Kaczensky, Hayes, & Promberger, 2005; Stahler et al., 2002; Vucetich, Peterson, & Waite, 2004).”
From Population responses of common ravens to reintroduced gray wolves (2018) · cites this paper as Vucetich et al., 2004
In areas where ravens overlap with wolves, ravens are numerous and ubiquitous scavengers of wolf-acquired carrion.
“In areas where they overlap with wolves, however, ravens are numerous and ubiquitous scavengers of wolf‐acquired carrion.”
From Population responses of common ravens to reintroduced gray wolves (2018) · cites this paper as Vucetich et al., 2004
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 71 · Cited by 176
- Authors
- Vucetich, J. A., Peterson, R. O., & Waite, T. A.
- Affiliations
- Michigan Technological University (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Vucetich, John A.
- Venue
- Animal Behaviour
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1117-1126
- ISSN
- 0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985900755
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Animal Behaviour (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (Michigan Technological University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Geographic Society
- National Park Service
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Keywords
- group foraging, scavenging, ravens, Corvus corax, indirect fitness, pack size, food sharing, social carnivores
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
