Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 776

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The mistreatment of covariate interaction terms in linear model analyses of behavioural and evolutionary ecology studies

Open access
Engqvist, Leif·2005·Animal Behaviour

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.01.016

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists

    Quinn, G. P., & Keough, M. J. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511806384 · Cited by 10,674 · cited 4×

    “2001; Quinn & Keough 2002): (1) nonsignificant covariate interaction terms must be removed before re-running the final analysis; (2) when there are significant interaction terms, which should not be removed, it is incorrect to interpret the response to the factor as an overall or average main…”
    BackgroundMethodInfluential

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 776

Metadata

Authors
Engqvist, L.
Venue
Animal Behaviour
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-10
Volume
70
Issue
4
Pages
967-971
ISSN
0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136738316
Cited by
776
References
1
FWCI
19.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The mistreatment of covariate interaction terms in linear model analyses of behavioural and evolutionary ecology studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.01.016
The paper
Engqvist, L. (2005). The mistreatment of covariate interaction terms in linear model analyses of behavioural and evolutionary ecology studies. Animal Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.01.016

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.