Cited by 12Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

The context of sexual coercion in orang-utans: When do male and female mating interests collide?

Open access
Kunz, Julia A., Duvot, Guilhem J., Willems, Erik P., Stickelberger, Julia, Spillmann, Brigitte, Utami Atmoko, Sri Suci, van Noordwijk, Maria A., van Schaik, Carel P.·2021·Animal Behaviour

Abstract

Sexual coercion is widespread in the animal kingdom. Its direct forms, including harassment and forced copulation, have largely been investigated as an expression of (alternative) male reproductive strategies, rather than the result of a sexual conflict between the sexes. Likewise, the frequent occurrence of forced copulations in orang-utans (Pongo spp.) has been attributed to male strategies and more recently also to concealed female fecundity. So far, however, the immediate contextual variables leading to forced copulations have rarely been examined. We compared two orang-utan populations, Suaq (Pongo abelii, Sumatra) and Tuanan (Pongo pygmaeus, Borneo), both characterized by an individual-based fission–fusion lifestyle, whereas their socioecology differs. We assessed how the occurrence of female-resisted and voluntary copulations was affected by female reproductive state, male morph (unflanged or flanged), measures of male–male competition, male–female relationship and ecological factors. Besides female reproductive state and male morph, predictors of female resistance were related to male–male competition. First, female resistance was more likely towards subordinate males who were displaced from proximity to the female by another male during that association. Second, the presence of additional flanged males increased the probability of female resistance. Third, the latency to both the arrival of another male and to the end of the association after sexual interactions was…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.09.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kunz, J. A., Duvot, G. J., Willems, E. P., Stickelberger, J., Spillmann, B., Utami Atmoko, S. S., van Noordwijk, M. A., & van Schaik, C. P.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Kunz, Julia A.
Venue
Animal Behaviour
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
182
Pages
67-90
ISSN
0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3211028244
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Animal Behaviour (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (310030B_160363/1)
  • Universität Zürich
  • Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia
  • Janggen-Pöhn Foundation
  • Indian Institute of Science
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
sexual coercion, forced copulation, sexual conflict, orangutans, Pongo abelii, Bornean orangutan, male reproductive strategies, male-male competition, female reproductive status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review