Reasons for non-intensification of treatment in people with type 2 diabetes receiving oral monotherapy: Outcomes from the prospective DIAttitude study
Open accessAbstract
Objectives To describe the management of glucose-lowering agents in people with type 2 diabetes initially on oral monotherapy, cared for by French general practitioners, and to identify reasons underlying treatment non-intensification. Methods People with type 2 diabetes on oral monotherapy were recruited by general practitioners and followed-up over 12 months. Patient characteristics, HbA1c, and glucose-lowering treatments were recorded electronically. Management objectives and reasons for treatment non-intensification were solicited from the general practitioners. Results A total of 1212 patients were enrolled by 198 general practitioners; 937 patients (mean age 68 years) were treated with oral monotherapy, and 916 patients had at least two successive HbA1c values recorded. Of these, 390 patients (43%) had HbA1c≥6.5% on both occasions, and 164/390 (42%) had their treatment intensified. The 226 patients whose treatment was not intensified were older (69±11 years vs. 66±12 years, P=0.02) and had better glycaemic control at study inclusion (6.9%±0.6 vs. 7.3%±0.8, P Conclusions General practitioners showed a patient-centred approach to treatment, but clinical inertia was apparent for 31% of the uncontrolled patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The criteria for clinical inertia included poor glycemic control indicated by mean HbA1c above target, failure to initiate or intensify treatment timely when indicated by HbA1c, lack of individualization of treatment goals, failure to initiate or intensify according to evidence-based guidelines, and failure to initiate or intensify therapy when indicated.
“The criteria for clinical inertia included poor glycemic control as indicated by mean HbA1c levels above the recommended target levels [20], failure to initiate or intensify treatment in a timely manner as indicated by a consultation in which treatment change based on HbA1c levels is indicated but does not occur [21], lack of individualization of treatment goals for some patients [22], failure to”
From Clinical Inertia in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
Cites
Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions to Prevent and Control Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review
Li, R., Zhang, P., Barker, L. E., Chowdhury, F. M., & Zhang, X. (2010) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc10-0843 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Clinical Inertia in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review
Almigbal, T. H., Alzarah, S. A., Aljanoubi, F. A., Alhafez, N. A., Aldawsari, M. R., Alghadeer, Z. Y., & Alrasheed, A. A. (2023) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina59010182 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
“It was even lower in France and Spain, where clinical inertia ranged from 31.0% to 42.3% (average 36.6”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
- Authors
- Balkau, B., Halimi, S., Blickle, J.-F., Vergès, B., Avignon, A., Attali, C., Chartier, I., & Amelineau, E.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- Université Joseph Fourier (FR)
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (FR)
- CHU Dijon Bourgogne (FR)
- Université Paris-Est Créteil (FR)
- Bristol-Myers Squibb (France) (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Balkau, Beverley
- Venue
- Annales d'Endocrinologie
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 649-657
- ISSN
- 0003-4266 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2519198550
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hal.umontpellier.fr
- Licence
- Locations
- Annales d Endocrinologie (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, oral monotherapy, treatment intensification, clinical inertia, HbA1c, glycemic control, general practitioners, treatment goals, patient-centered care
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Oral, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude of Health Personnel, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Treatment Outcome, General Practitioners
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review