Cited by 165Gun Ownership and Violence ResearchCrime Patterns and InterventionsInjury Epidemiology and Prevention

Before and After the Trauma Bay: The Prevention of Violent Injury Among Youth

Cunningham, Rebecca, Knox, Lynda, Fein, Joel, Harrison, Stephanie, Frisch, Keri, Walton, Maureen, Dicker, Rochelle, Calhoun, Deane +2 more·2009·Annals of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Despite a decline in the incidence of homicide in recent years, the United States retains the highest youth homicide rate among the 26 wealthiest nations. Homicide is the second leading cause of death overall and the leading cause of death for male blacks aged 15 to 24 years. High rates of health care recidivism for violent injury, along with increasing research that demonstrates the effectiveness of violence prevention strategies in other arenas, dictate that physicians recognize violence as a complex preventable health problem and implement violence prevention activities into current practice rather than relegating violence prevention to the criminal justice arena. The emergency department (ED) and trauma center settings in many ways are uniquely positioned for this role. Exposure to firearm violence doubles the probability that a youth will commit violence within 2 years, and research shows that retaliatory injury risk among violent youth victims is 88 times higher than among those who were never exposed to violence. This article reviews the potential role of the ED in the prevention of youth violence, as well as the growing number of ED- and hospital-based violence prevention programs already in place.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.11.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 83 · Cited by 165

Authors
Cunningham, R., Knox, L., Fein, J., Harrison, S., Frisch, K., Walton, M., Dicker, R., Calhoun, D., Becker, M., & Hargarten, S. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
  • San Francisco General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Cunningham, Rebecca
Venue
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
490-500
ISSN
0196-0644 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000965287
Cited by
165
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
Keywords
youth violence, violence prevention, juvenile homicide, gun violence, emergency department, trauma centers, violence prevention programs
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, United States, Violence, Wounds and Injuries, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review