Can You Multitask? Evidence and Limitations of Task Switching and Multitasking in Emergency Medicine
Abstract
Emergency physicians work in a fast-paced environment that is characterized by frequent interruptions and the expectation that they will perform multiple tasks efficiently and without error while maintaining oversight of the entire emergency department. However, there is a lack of definition and understanding of the behaviors that constitute effective task switching and multitasking, as well as how to improve these skills. This article reviews the literature on task switching and multitasking in a variety of disciplines-including cognitive science, human factors engineering, business, and medicine-to define and describe the successful performance of task switching and multitasking in emergency medicine. Multitasking, defined as the performance of two tasks simultaneously, is not possible except when behaviors become completely automatic; instead, physicians rapidly switch between small tasks. This task switching causes disruption in the primary task and may contribute to error. A framework is described to enhance the understanding and practice of these behaviors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Task switching increases error rates.
“Research has shown that such task switching increases error rates.47”
From Brain health consequences of digital technology use (2020) · cites this paper as [47]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 129
- Authors
- Skaugset, L. M., Farrell, S., Carney, M., Wolff, M., Santen, S. A., Perry, M., & Cico, S. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Skaugset, L. Melissa
- ORCID
- Venue
- Annals of Emergency Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-195
- ISSN
- 0196-0644 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2179341107
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 1.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Keywords
- task switching, multitasking, emergency physicians, interruptions, task performance, medical errors, automaticity, human factors engineering, cognitive science, emergency department workflow
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Cognition, Emergency Medicine, Humans, Physicians, Task Performance and Analysis, Workload
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review