Cited by 129Personal Information Management and User BehaviorPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Can You Multitask? Evidence and Limitations of Task Switching and Multitasking in Emergency Medicine

Skaugset, L. Melissa, Farrell, Susan, Carney, Michele, Wolff, Margaret, Santen, Sally A., Perry, Marcia, Cico, Stephen John·2016·Annals of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Emergency physicians work in a fast-paced environment that is characterized by frequent interruptions and the expectation that they will perform multiple tasks efficiently and without error while maintaining oversight of the entire emergency department. However, there is a lack of definition and understanding of the behaviors that constitute effective task switching and multitasking, as well as how to improve these skills. This article reviews the literature on task switching and multitasking in a variety of disciplines-including cognitive science, human factors engineering, business, and medicine-to define and describe the successful performance of task switching and multitasking in emergency medicine. Multitasking, defined as the performance of two tasks simultaneously, is not possible except when behaviors become completely automatic; instead, physicians rapidly switch between small tasks. This task switching causes disruption in the primary task and may contribute to error. A framework is described to enhance the understanding and practice of these behaviors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.10.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 129

Authors
Skaugset, L. M., Farrell, S., Carney, M., Wolff, M., Santen, S. A., Perry, M., & Cico, S. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Skaugset, L. Melissa
Venue
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
68
Issue
2
Pages
189-195
ISSN
0196-0644 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2179341107
Cited by
129
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
task switching, multitasking, emergency physicians, interruptions, task performance, medical errors, automaticity, human factors engineering, cognitive science, emergency department workflow
MeSH terms
Attention, Cognition, Emergency Medicine, Humans, Physicians, Task Performance and Analysis, Workload

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review