Task switching, multitasking, and errors: a psychologic perspective on the impact of interruptions
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dual-task conditions decrease performance in both laboratory and medical settings.
“Dual-task conditions are known to decrease perfor-mance in both laboratory settings [31] and medical settings [32][33][34][35] .”
From Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy (2024) · cites this paper as [35]
Cites
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1 · Cited by 9,860 · see citing works
The Importance of Cognitive Errors in Diagnosis and Strategies to Minimize Them
Croskerry, P. (2003) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200308000-00003 · Cited by 1,675 · see citing works
Why interleaving enhances inductive learning: The roles of discrimination and retrieval
Birnbaum, M. S., Kornell, N., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2013) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0272-7 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Fox, A. B., Rosen, J., & Crawford, M. (2009) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2008.0107 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy
Introzzi, L., Zonca, J., Cabitza, F., Cherubini, P., & Reverberi, C. (2024) · Digestive and Liver Disease · doi:10.1016/j.dld.2023.10.018 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sherbino, J., & Norman, G.
- Affiliations
- McMaster University (CA)
- Venue
- Annals of Emergency Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-09
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 425-428
- ISSN
- 0196-0644 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3194294856
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 1.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Keywords
- task switching, multitasking, interruptions, error, cognitive performance, emergency medicine, patient safety
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Task Performance and Analysis, Workload
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
