Cited by 65Health disparities and outcomesIntergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesSchool Choice and Performance

Does academic achievement during childhood and adolescence benefit later health?

Open access
Lê-Scherban, Félice, Diez Roux, Ana V., Li, Yun, Morgenstern, Hal·2014·Annals of Epidemiology

Abstract

Purpose Educational disparities in health persist after adjustment for income and occupation, suggesting that other purely cognitive and psychosocial mechanisms may be involved. Unlike occupation- or income-mediated effects, effects of cognitive and psychosocial gains-as reflected in academic achievement-may be apparent even before schooling is completed.Methods We used data spanning 10 years on a national U.S. cohort of 2546 children aged 3-14 years at baseline to estimate the effects of academic achievement, measured by standardized tests of cognitive achievement, on future health. We used marginal structural models to address potential mutual influence of achievement and health on each other over time.Results One SD higher academic achievement 1997-2002 was associated with a lower prevalence of poorer health status in 2007 in girls (prevalence ratio = 0.87 [(95% confidence interval) 0.78-0.97]) but not in boys (prevalence ratio = 0.96 [0.86-1.08]). Higher achievement was also weakly associated with lower body mass index and less psychological distress among girls only.Conclusions Academic achievement may benefit future health but a number of questions remain unanswered, including reasons for the gender differences and how academic achievement-related health disparities may progress over the life course and interact with other social determinants of health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.02.008

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 65

Authors
Lê-Scherban, F., Diez Roux, A. V., Li, Y., & Morgenstern, H.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Annals of Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
344-355
ISSN
1047-2797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129076999
Cited by
65
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • University of Michigan
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD072493, R01HD052646, R01HD069609)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
academic performance, cognitive achievement, psychosocial factors, childhood and adolescence, health status, body mass index, psychological distress, gender differences, social determinants of health, life course
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Educational Measurement, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, United States, Models, Statistical, Health Status Disparities, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review