Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 99

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Traffic-related air pollution and risk of preterm birth in the San Joaquin Valley of California

Padula, Amy M., Mortimer, Kathleen M., Tager, Ira B., Hammond, S. Katharine, Lurmann, Frederick W., Yang, Wei, Stevenson, David K., Shaw, Gary M.·2014·Annals of Epidemiology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.10.004

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. McElrath, 2008, Pregnancy disorders that lead to delivery before the 28th week of gestation: an epidemiologic approach to classification, Am J Epidemiol, 168, 980, 10.1093/aje/kwn202 · DOI
  2. Savitz, 2008, Invited commentary: disaggregating preterm birth to determine etiology, Am J Epidemiol, 168, 990, 10.1093/aje/kwn193 · DOI
  3. Shah, 2010, Air pollution and birth outcomes: a systematic review, Environ Int, 37, 498, 10.1016/j.envint.2010.10.009 · DOI
  4. Stieb, 2012, Ambient air pollution, birth weight and preterm birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Environ Res, 117, 100, 10.1016/j.envres.2012.05.007 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Wu, 2009, Association between local traffic-generated air pollution and preeclampsia and preterm delivery in the south coast air basin of California, Environ Health Perspect, 117, 1773, 10.1289/ehp.0800334 · DOI
  6. Yorifuji, 2011, Residential proximity to major roads and preterm births, Epidemiology, 22, 74, 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181fe759f · DOI
  7. Brauer, 2008, A cohort study of traffic-related air pollution impacts on birth outcomes, Environ Health Perspect, 116, 680, 10.1289/ehp.10952 · DOI
  8. Genereux, 2008, Neighbourhood socioeconomic status, maternal education and adverse birth outcomes among mothers living near highways, J Epidemiol Community Health, 62, 695, 10.1136/jech.2007.066167 · DOI
  9. Zeka, 2008, The effects of socioeconomic status and indices of physical environment on reduced birth weight and preterm births in Eastern Massachusetts, Environ Health, 7, 60, 10.1186/1476-069X-7-60 · DOI
  10. Yi, 2009, Does area level socioeconomic status modify the effects of PM10 on preterm delivery?, Environ Res, 110, 55, 10.1016/j.envres.2009.10.004 · DOI
  11. Ponce, 2005, Preterm birth: the interaction of traffic-related air pollution with economic hardship in Los Angeles neighborhoods, Am J Epidemiol, 162, 140, 10.1093/aje/kwi173 · DOI
  12. Jerrett, 2005, A review and evaluation of intraurban air pollution exposure models, J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol, 15, 185, 10.1038/sj.jea.7500388 · DOI
  13. Kan, 2008, Prospective analysis of traffic exposure as a risk factor for incident coronary heart disease: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, Environ Health Perspect, 116, 1463, 10.1289/ehp.11290 · DOI
  14. Gauderman, 2005, Associations between childhood asthma, nitrogen dioxide, and proximity to major roadways, Epidemiology, 16, 737, 10.1097/01.ede.0000181308.51440.75 · DOI
  15. O'Campo, 2008, Neighborhood deprivation and preterm birth among non-Hispanic Black and White women in eight geographic areas in the United States, Am J Epidemiol, 167, 155, 10.1093/aje/kwm277 · DOI
  16. Zeitlin, 2004, Fetal sex and indicated very preterm birth: results of the EPIPAGE study, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 190, 1322
  17. Padula, 2013, The Association of Ambient Air Pollution and Traffic Exposures With Selected Congenital Anomalies in the San Joaquin Valley of California, Am J Epidemiol, 177, 1074, 10.1093/aje/kws367 · DOI
  18. Dominici, 2010, Protecting human health from air pollution: shifting from a single-pollutant to a multipollutant approach, Epidemiology, 21, 187, 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181cc86e8 · DOI
  19. Bobak, 2000, Outdoor air pollution, low birth weight, and prematurity, Environ Health Perspect, 108, 173, 10.1289/ehp.00108173 · DOI
  20. Muglia, 2010, The enigma of spontaneous preterm birth, N Engl J Med, 362, 529, 10.1056/NEJMra0904308 · DOI
  21. Smith, 2007, Parturition, N Engl J Med, 356, 271, 10.1056/NEJMra061360 · DOI
  22. O'Neill, 2013, Air pollution, inflammation and preterm birth in Mexico City: study design and methods, Sci Total Environ, 448, 79, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.079 · DOI
  23. Schulman, 1993, Exposure misclassification due to residential mobility during pregnancy in epidemiologic investigations of congenital malformations, Arch Environ Health, 48, 114, 10.1080/00039896.1993.9938404 · DOI
  24. Faiz, 2012, Ambient air pollution and the risk of stillbirth, Am J Epidemiol, 176, 308, 10.1093/aje/kws029 · DOI
  25. Hwang, 2011, Air pollution and stillbirth: a population-based case-control study in Taiwan, Environ Health Perspect, 119, 1345, 10.1289/ehp.1003056 · DOI
  26. Sram, 2005, Ambient air pollution and pregnancy outcomes: a review of the literature, Environ Health Perspect, 113, 375, 10.1289/ehp.6362 · DOI
  27. Maroziene, 2002, Maternal exposure to low-level air pollution and pregnancy outcomes: a population-based study, Environ Health, 1, 6, 10.1186/1476-069X-1-6 · DOI
  28. Llop, 2010, Preterm birth and exposure to air pollutants during pregnancy, Environ Res, 110, 778, 10.1016/j.envres.2010.09.009 · DOI
  29. Liu, 2003, Association between gaseous ambient air pollutants and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Vancouver, Canada, Environ Health Perspect, 111, 1773, 10.1289/ehp.6251 · DOI
  30. Ritz, 2000, Effect of air pollution on preterm birth among children born in Southern California between 1989 and 1993, Epidemiology, 11, 502, 10.1097/00001648-200009000-00004 · DOI
  31. Ritz, 2007, Ambient air pollution and preterm birth in the environment and pregnancy outcomes study at the University of California, Los Angeles, Am J Epidemiol, 166, 1045, 10.1093/aje/kwm181 · DOI
  32. Miranda, 2013, Proximity to roadways and pregnancy outcomes, J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 23, 32, 10.1038/jes.2012.78 · DOI
  33. Yang, 2003, Evidence for increased risks of preterm delivery in a population residing near a freeway in Taiwan, Arch Environ Health, 58, 649, 10.3200/AEOH.58.10.649-654 · DOI
  34. Wilhelm, 2003, Residential proximity to traffic and adverse birth outcomes in Los Angeles county, California, 1994-1996, Environ Health Perspect, 111, 207, 10.1289/ehp.5688 · DOI
  35. Dadvand, 2013, Air Pollution and Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Spatiotemporal Analysis, Am J Epidemiol
  36. Simhan, 2005, Preterm premature rupture of membranes: diagnosis, evaluation and management strategies, BJOG, 112, 32, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00582.x · DOI
  37. Ghosh, 2013, Effects of residential indoor air quality and household ventilation on preterm birth and term low birth weight in Los Angeles County, California, Am J Public Health, 103, 686, 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300987 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Padula, A. M., Mortimer, K. M., Tager, I. B., Hammond, S. K., Lurmann, F. W., Yang, W., Stevenson, D. K., & Shaw, G. M.
Venue
Annals of Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
24
Issue
12
Pages
888-895.e4
ISSN
1047-2797
Cited by
99
References
0
Language
en
Funders
  • NIEHS (R21 ESO14891, P20 ES018173, P01ES022849, K99ES021470)
  • CDC (6U01DD000489)
  • March of Dimes Prematurity Research Center (50185)
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) STAR (RD83459601, RD83543501)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.