It's all relative: analyzing microbiome data as compositions
Open accessAbstract
Purpose The ability to properly analyze and interpret large microbiome data sets has lagged behind our ability to acquire such data sets from environmental or clinical samples. Sequencing instruments impose a structure on these data: the natural sample space of a 16S rRNA gene sequencing data set is a simplex, which is a part of real space that is restricted to nonnegative values with a constant sum. Such data are compositional and should be analyzed using compositionally appropriate tools and approaches. However, most of the tools for 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis assume these data are unrestricted.Methods We show that existing tools for compositional data (CoDa) analysis can be readily adapted to analyze high-throughput sequencing data sets.Results The Human Microbiome Project tongue versus buccal mucosa data set shows how the CoDa approach can address the major elements of microbiome analysis. Reanalysis of a publicly available autism microbiome data set shows that the CoDa approach in concert with multiple hypothesis test corrections prevent false positive identifications.Conclusions The CoDa approach is readily scalable to microbiome-sized analyses. We provide example code and make recommendations to improve the analysis and reporting of microbiome data sets.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If the compositional property is not accounted for, the likelihood of introducing false positives in differential abundance analysis and negative correlation biases in correlation-based analysis increases heavily.
“If this statistical property is not accounted for, the likelihood of introducing false positives in differential abundance analysis59,60 and negative correlation biases in correlation-based analysis61,62 increases heavily.”
From Longitudinal gut microbiome changes in immune checkpoint blockade-treated advanced melanoma (2024) · cites this paper as [62]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 323
- Authors
- Gloor, G. B., Wu, J. R., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., & Egozcue, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Western University (CA)
- Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Gloor, Gregory B.
- Venue
- Annals of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-05
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 322-329
- ISSN
- 1047-2797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2326641739
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 12.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Annals of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Universitat de Girona Digital Repository (Universitat de Girona) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Repositori UJI (Universitat Jaume I) (acceptedVersion)
- RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion)
- RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion)
- RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Science and Engineering Research Council
- CIHR
- Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness
- Generalitat de Catalunya
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
- Keywords
- microbiome analysis, compositional data analysis, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, Human Microbiome Project, multiple comparisons, false positive detection
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Male, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Sensitivity and Specificity, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Microbiota, Datasets as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review