The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The prevalence of pre-exposure prophylaxis use and the pre-exposure prophylaxis–to-need ratio in the fourth quarter of 2017, United States
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: The number of individuals who have started a regimen for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in the United States is not well characterized but has been on the rise since 2012. This analysis assesses the distribution of PrEP use nationally and among subgroups. METHODS: A validated algorithm quantifying tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine for PrEP in the United States was applied to a national prescription database to determine the quarterly prevalence of PrEP use. HIV diagnoses from 2016 were used as an epidemiological proxy for PrEP need. The PrEP-to-need ratio (PnR) was defined as the number of PrEP users divided by new HIV diagnoses. RESULTS: A total of 70,395 individuals used PrEP in the fourth quarter of 2017: 67,166 males and 3229 females. Nationally, prevalence of PrEP use was 26/100,000 (range across states per 100,000 [RAS/100k]: 4-73) and the PnR was 1.8 (RAS: 0.5-6.6). Prevalence of PrEP use among males and females, respectively, was 50/100,000 and 2/100,000 (RAS/100k: 7-143 and 0.3-7) and PnR was 2.1 and 0.4 (RAS: 0.6-7.1 and 0.1-4.0). Prevalence of PrEP use was lowest among individuals aged less than or equal to 24 and more than or equal to 55 years (15/100,000 and 6/100,000, RAS/100k: 1-45 and 0.4-14), with PnR 0.9 and 1.5 (RAS: 0.2-5.6 and 0.3-7.0). The Northeast had the highest PnR (3.3); the South had the lowest (1.0). States with Medicaid expansion had more than double the PnR than states without expansion. CONCLUSIONS: Available data suggest that females, individuals aged less than or equal to 24 years and residents of the South had lower levels of PrEP use relative to epidemic need. These results are ecological, and misclassification may attenuate results. PnR is useful for future assessments of HIV prevention strategy uptake.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men.
Grant, R. M., Lama, J. R., Anderson, P. L., McMahan, V., Liu, A. Y., Vargas, L., Goicochea, P., Casapía, M., Guanira-Carranza, J. V., Ramirez-Cardich, M. E., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1011205 · Cited by 5,096
McCormack, S., Dunn, D. T., Desai, M., Dolling, D. I., Gafos, M., Gilson, R., Sullivan, A. K., Clarke, A., Reeves, I., Schembri, G., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00056-2 · Cited by 1,878
Choopanya, K., Martin, M., Suntharasamai, P., Sangkum, U., Mock, P. A., Leethochawalit, M., Chiamwongpaet, S., Kitisin, P., Natrujirote, P., Kittimunkong, S., et al. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61127-7 · Cited by 1,463
Liu, A. Y., Cohen, S. E., Vittinghoff, E., Anderson, P. L., Doblecki-Lewis, S., Bacon, O., Chege, W., Postle, B. S., Matheson, T., Amico, K. R., et al. (2016) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4683 · Cited by 602
Cited by
Barriers to the Wider Use of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in the United States: A Narrative Review
Mayer, K. H., Agwu, A., & Malebranche, D. (2020) · Advances in Therapy · doi:10.1007/s12325-020-01295-0 · Cited by 426
Epidemiology of HIV in the USA: epidemic burden, inequities, contexts, and responses
Sullivan, P. S., Satcher Johnson, A., Pembleton, E. S., Stephenson, R., Justice, A. C., Althoff, K. N., Bradley, H., Castel, A. D., Oster, A. M., Rosenberg, E. S., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00395-0 · Cited by 355
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Siegler, A. J., Mouhanna, F., Giler, R. M., Weiss, K., Pembleton, E., Guest, J., Jones, J., Castel, A., Yeung, H., Kramer, M., McCallister, S., & Sullivan, P. S.
- Venue
- Annals of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 841-849
- ISSN
- 1047-2797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2808046551
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 30.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The prevalence of pre-exposure prophylaxis use and the pre-exposure prophylaxis–to-need ratio in the fourth quarter of 2017, United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.06.005
- The paper
- Siegler, A. J., Mouhanna, F., Giler, R. M., Weiss, K., Pembleton, E., Guest, J., Jones, J., Castel, A., Yeung, H., Kramer, M., McCallister, S., & Sullivan, P. S. (2018). The prevalence of pre-exposure prophylaxis use and the pre-exposure prophylaxis–to-need ratio in the fourth quarter of 2017, United States. Annals of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.06.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.