Cited by 162Nausea and vomiting managementCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchCancer survivorship and care

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Oral THC:CBD cannabis extract for refractory chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase II crossover trial

Open access

Abstract

Background This multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase II/III trial aimed to evaluate an oral THC:CBD (tetrahydrocannabinol:cannabidiol) cannabis extract for prevention of refractory chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Here we report the phase II component results. Patients and methods Eligible patients experienced CINV during moderate-to-high emetogenic intravenous chemotherapy despite guideline-consistent antiemetic prophylaxis. Study treatment consisted of one cycle of 1-4 self-titrated capsules of oral THC 2.5 mg/CBD 2.5 mg (TN-TC11M) three times daily, from days -1 to 5, and 1 cycle of matching placebo in a crossover design, then blinded patient preference for a third cycle. The primary end point was the proportion of participants with complete response during 0-120 h from chemotherapy. A total of 80 participants provided 80% power to detect a 20% absolute improvement with a two-sided P value of 0.1. Results A total of 81 participants were randomised; 72 completing two cycles were included in the efficacy analyses and 78 not withdrawing consent were included in safety analyses. Median age was 55 years (range 29-80 years); 78% were female. Complete response was improved with THC:CBD from 14% to 25% (relative risk 1.77, 90% confidence interval 1.12-2.79, P = 0.041), with similar effects on absence of emesis, use of rescue medications, absence of significant nausea, and summary scores for the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE). Thirty-one percent experienced moderate or severe cannabinoid-related adverse events such as sedation, dizziness, or disorientation, but 83% of participants preferred cannabis to placebo. No serious adverse events were attributed to THC:CBD. Conclusion The addition of oral THC:CBD to standard antiemetics was associated with less nausea and vomiting but additional side-effects. Most participants preferred THC:CBD to placebo. Based on these promising results, we plan to recruit an additional 170 participants to complete accrual for the definitive, phase III, parallel group analysis. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12616001036404; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=370473&isReview=true.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.07.020

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Aapro, 2012, The effect of guideline-consistent antiemetic therapy on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV): the Pan European Emesis Registry (PEER), Ann Oncol, 23, 1986, 10.1093/annonc/mds021 · DOI
  2. Gilmore, 2014, Antiemetic guideline consistency and incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in US community oncology practice: INSPIRE Study, J Oncol Pract, 10, 68, 10.1200/JOP.2012.000816 · DOI
  3. Molassiotis, 2008, A prospective observational study of chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting in routine practice in a UK cancer centre, Support Care Cancer, 16, 201
  4. Navari, 2016, Antiemetic prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, N Engl J Med, 374, 1356, 10.1056/NEJMra1515442 · DOI
  5. Bhattacharyya, 2010, Opposite effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol on human brain function and psychopathology, Neuropsychopharmacology, 35, 764, 10.1038/npp.2009.184 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Kramer, 2015, Medical marijuana for cancer, CA Cancer J Clin, 65, 109
  7. Chow, 2020, Oral cannabinoid for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting—a systematic review and meta-analysis, Support Care Cancer, 28, 2095
  8. Wilkie, 2016, Medical marijuana use in oncology: a review, JAMA Oncol, 2, 670, 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0155 · DOI
  9. Bonaccorso, 2019, Cannabidiol (CBD) use in psychiatric disorders: a systematic review, Neurotoxicology, 74, 282, 10.1016/j.neuro.2019.08.002 · DOI
  10. Duran, 2010, Preliminary efficacy and safety of an oromucosal standardized cannabis extract in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, Br J Clin Pharmacol, 70, 656, 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03743.x · DOI
  11. Mersiades, 2018, Oral cannabinoid-rich THC:CBD cannabis extract for secondary prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a study protocol for a pilot and definitive randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial (CannabisCINV), BMJ Open, 8, e020745, 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020745 · DOI
  12. Roila, 2016, MASCC and ESMO consensus guidelines for the prevention of chemotherapy and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: ESMO clinical practice guidelines, Ann Oncol, 27, v119, 10.1093/annonc/mdw270 · DOI
  13. Martin, 2003, Assessing the impact of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting on patients' daily lives: a modified version of the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) with 5-day recall, Support Care Cancer, 11, 522
  14. Lintzeris, 2019, Nabiximols for the treatment of cannabis dependence: a randomized clinical trial, JAMA Intern Med, 179, 1242, 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.1993 · DOI
  15. Zeyl, 2020, What do you know about Maryjane? A systematic review of the current data on the THC:CBD ratio, Subst Use Misuse, 55, 1223, 10.1080/10826084.2020.1731547 · DOI
  16. Millar, 2019, A systematic review of cannabidiol dosing in clinical populations, Br J Clin Pharmacol, 85, 1888, 10.1111/bcp.14038 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Grimison, P., Mersiades, A., Kirby, A., Lintzeris, N., Morton, R., Haber, P., Olver, I., Walsh, A., McGregor, I., Cheung, Y., Tognela, A., Hahn, C., Briscoe, K., Aghmesheh, M., Fox, P., Abdi, E., Clarke, S., Della-Fiorentina, S., Shannon, J., Gedye, C., Begbie, S., Simes, J., & Stockler, M.
Affiliations
  • Chris O’Brien Lifehouse (AU)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (AU)
  • South Eastern Sydney Local Health District (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • Camden and Campbelltown Hospitals (AU)
  • Wollongong Hospital (AU)
  • Northern Cancer Institute (AU)
  • Nepean Hospital (AU)
  • Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Grimison, P.
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
31
Issue
11
Pages
1553-1560
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3048881461
Cited by
162
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1
FWCI
17.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
NSW Ministry of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nausea and vomiting management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, antiemetic prophylaxis, emesis prevention, patient preferences, Functional Living Index-Emesis, emetogenic chemotherapy, crossover trial
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antiemetics, Antineoplastic Agents, Australia, Cannabidiol, Cannabis, Double-Blind Method, Drug Combinations, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nausea, Plant Extracts, Dronabinol, Vomiting, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review