The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oral THC:CBD cannabis extract for refractory chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase II crossover trial
Open accessAbstract
Background This multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase II/III trial aimed to evaluate an oral THC:CBD (tetrahydrocannabinol:cannabidiol) cannabis extract for prevention of refractory chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Here we report the phase II component results. Patients and methods Eligible patients experienced CINV during moderate-to-high emetogenic intravenous chemotherapy despite guideline-consistent antiemetic prophylaxis. Study treatment consisted of one cycle of 1-4 self-titrated capsules of oral THC 2.5 mg/CBD 2.5 mg (TN-TC11M) three times daily, from days -1 to 5, and 1 cycle of matching placebo in a crossover design, then blinded patient preference for a third cycle. The primary end point was the proportion of participants with complete response during 0-120 h from chemotherapy. A total of 80 participants provided 80% power to detect a 20% absolute improvement with a two-sided P value of 0.1. Results A total of 81 participants were randomised; 72 completing two cycles were included in the efficacy analyses and 78 not withdrawing consent were included in safety analyses. Median age was 55 years (range 29-80 years); 78% were female. Complete response was improved with THC:CBD from 14% to 25% (relative risk 1.77, 90% confidence interval 1.12-2.79, P = 0.041), with similar effects on absence of emesis, use of rescue medications, absence of significant nausea, and summary scores for the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE). Thirty-one percent experienced moderate or severe cannabinoid-related adverse events such as sedation, dizziness, or disorientation, but 83% of participants preferred cannabis to placebo. No serious adverse events were attributed to THC:CBD. Conclusion The addition of oral THC:CBD to standard antiemetics was associated with less nausea and vomiting but additional side-effects. Most participants preferred THC:CBD to placebo. Based on these promising results, we plan to recruit an additional 170 participants to complete accrual for the definitive, phase III, parallel group analysis. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12616001036404; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=370473&isReview=true.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“recent studies have continued to evaluate the effects of cannabis extracts rich in both THC and CBD for this purpose, and showed that extracts containing THC and CBD at a ratio 1:1 reduced the nausea and vomiting in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy when administered thrice per day as add-on therapy [33].”
From Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Technology for Recovering Valuable Phytochemicals from Cannabis sativa L. and Valorization of Its Biomass for Food Applications (2023) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cites
Richardson, J., Iezzi, A., Khan, M. A., & Maxwell, A. (2014) · The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research · doi:10.1007/s40271-013-0036-x · Cited by 504
Population norms and meaningful differences for the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) measure
Hawthorne, G., & Osborne, R. (2005) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1111/j.1467-842x.2005.tb00063.x · Cited by 294
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Aapro, 2012, The effect of guideline-consistent antiemetic therapy on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV): the Pan European Emesis Registry (PEER), Ann Oncol, 23, 1986, 10.1093/annonc/mds021 · DOI
- Gilmore, 2014, Antiemetic guideline consistency and incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in US community oncology practice: INSPIRE Study, J Oncol Pract, 10, 68, 10.1200/JOP.2012.000816 · DOI
- Molassiotis, 2008, A prospective observational study of chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting in routine practice in a UK cancer centre, Support Care Cancer, 16, 201
- Navari, 2016, Antiemetic prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, N Engl J Med, 374, 1356, 10.1056/NEJMra1515442 · DOI
- Bhattacharyya, 2010, Opposite effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol on human brain function and psychopathology, Neuropsychopharmacology, 35, 764, 10.1038/npp.2009.184 · DOI · Paper page
- Kramer, 2015, Medical marijuana for cancer, CA Cancer J Clin, 65, 109
- Chow, 2020, Oral cannabinoid for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting—a systematic review and meta-analysis, Support Care Cancer, 28, 2095
- Wilkie, 2016, Medical marijuana use in oncology: a review, JAMA Oncol, 2, 670, 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0155 · DOI
- Bonaccorso, 2019, Cannabidiol (CBD) use in psychiatric disorders: a systematic review, Neurotoxicology, 74, 282, 10.1016/j.neuro.2019.08.002 · DOI
- Duran, 2010, Preliminary efficacy and safety of an oromucosal standardized cannabis extract in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, Br J Clin Pharmacol, 70, 656, 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03743.x · DOI
- Mersiades, 2018, Oral cannabinoid-rich THC:CBD cannabis extract for secondary prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a study protocol for a pilot and definitive randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial (CannabisCINV), BMJ Open, 8, e020745, 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020745 · DOI
- Roila, 2016, MASCC and ESMO consensus guidelines for the prevention of chemotherapy and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: ESMO clinical practice guidelines, Ann Oncol, 27, v119, 10.1093/annonc/mdw270 · DOI
- Martin, 2003, Assessing the impact of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting on patients' daily lives: a modified version of the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) with 5-day recall, Support Care Cancer, 11, 522
- Lintzeris, 2019, Nabiximols for the treatment of cannabis dependence: a randomized clinical trial, JAMA Intern Med, 179, 1242, 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.1993 · DOI
- Zeyl, 2020, What do you know about Maryjane? A systematic review of the current data on the THC:CBD ratio, Subst Use Misuse, 55, 1223, 10.1080/10826084.2020.1731547 · DOI
- Millar, 2019, A systematic review of cannabidiol dosing in clinical populations, Br J Clin Pharmacol, 85, 1888, 10.1111/bcp.14038 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A narrative review of molecular mechanism and therapeutic effect of cannabidiol (CBD)
Peng, J., Fan, M., An, C., Ni, F., Huang, W., & Luo, J. (2022) · Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology · doi:10.1111/bcpt.13710 · Cited by 315
Bilbao, A., & Spanagel, R. (2022) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-022-02459-1 · Cited by 181
Cannabis and Cannabinoids in Adults With Cancer: ASCO Guideline
Braun, I. M., Bohlke, K., Abrams, D. I., Anderson, H., Balneaves, L. G., Bar-Sela, G., Bowles, D. W., Chai, P. R., Damani, A., Gupta, A., et al. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.23.02596 · Cited by 116
Mechanisms of Cannabidiol (CBD) in Cancer Treatment: A Review
Heider, C. G., Itenberg, S. A., Rao, J., Ma, H., & Wu, X. (2022) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology11060817 · Cited by 93
“The known beneficial effects of CBD on cancer include tumor cell repression, the relief of cancer-related pain, and the reduction of chemotherapy effects, such as nausea and vomiting [22].”
BackgroundStructural basis of selective cannabinoid CB2 receptor activation
Li, X., Chang, H., Bouma, J., de Paus, L. V., Mukhopadhyay, P., Pálóczi, J., Mustafa, M. A., van der Horst, C., Kumar, S. S., Wu, L., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37112-9 · Cited by 79
“N-((6-bromo-3-fluoropyridin-2-yl)methyl)tetrahydro-2H-pyran4-amine (4) (6-Bromo-3-fluoropyridin-2-yl)methyl methanesulfonate (1.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Grimison, P., Mersiades, A., Kirby, A., Lintzeris, N., Morton, R., Haber, P., Olver, I., Walsh, A., McGregor, I., Cheung, Y., Tognela, A., Hahn, C., Briscoe, K., Aghmesheh, M., Fox, P., Abdi, E., Clarke, S., Della-Fiorentina, S., Shannon, J., Gedye, C., Begbie, S., Simes, J., & Stockler, M.
- Affiliations
- Chris O’Brien Lifehouse (AU)
- National Health and Medical Research Council (AU)
- South Eastern Sydney Local Health District (AU)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
- Camden and Campbelltown Hospitals (AU)
- Wollongong Hospital (AU)
- Northern Cancer Institute (AU)
- Nepean Hospital (AU)
- Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Grimison, P.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Annals of Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1553-1560
- ISSN
- 0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3048881461
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 17.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- NSW Ministry of Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nausea and vomiting management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, antiemetic prophylaxis, emesis prevention, patient preferences, Functional Living Index-Emesis, emetogenic chemotherapy, crossover trial
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antiemetics, Antineoplastic Agents, Australia, Cannabidiol, Cannabis, Double-Blind Method, Drug Combinations, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nausea, Plant Extracts, Dronabinol, Vomiting, Cross-Over Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review