Cited by 92Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesAdvanced Breast Cancer TherapiesCancer Treatment and Pharmacology

A phase II randomized trial of cobimetinib plus chemotherapy, with or without atezolizumab, as first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (COLET): primary analysis

Open access
Brufsky, A., Kim, S.B., Zvirbule, Ž., Eniu, A., Mebis, J., Sohn, J.H., Wongchenko, M., Chohan, S. +5 more·2021·Annals of Oncology

Abstract

Background Resistance to standard chemotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is associated with upregulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. Cobimetinib, an MAPK/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK) inhibitor, may increase sensitivity to taxanes and programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors. COLET is a three-cohort phase II study evaluating first-line cobimetinib plus chemotherapy, with or without atezolizumab, in patients with locally advanced or mTNBC. Patients and methods Patients were ≥18 years with locally advanced or mTNBC. Following a safety run-in, patients in cohort I were randomized 1:1 to cobimetinib (60 mg, D3-D23 of each 28-day cycle) or placebo, plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m 2 , D1, 8, and 15). Additional patients were randomized (1:1) to cohort II or III to receive cobimetinib plus atezolizumab (840 mg, D1 and D15) and either paclitaxel (cohort II) or nab-paclitaxel [cohort III (100 mg/m 2 , D1, D8, and D15)]. Primary endpoints were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) (cohort I) and confirmed objective response rate (ORR) (cohorts II/III). Safety and tolerability were also assessed. Results In the expansion stages, median PFS was 5.5 months for cobimetinib/paclitaxel versus 3.8 months for placebo/paclitaxel in cohort I [hazard ratio 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-1.24; P = 0.25]. In cohort I, ORR was 38.3% (95% CI 24.40-52.20) for cobimetinib/paclitaxel and 20.9% (95% CI 8.77-33.09) for placebo/paclitaxel; ORRs in cohorts II and III were 34.4% (95% CI 18.57-53.19) and 29.0% (95% CI 14.22-48.04), respectively. Diarrhea was the most common grade ≥3 adverse events across all cohorts. Conclusions Cobimetinib added to paclitaxel did not lead to a statistically significant increase in PFS or ORR, although a nonsignificant trend toward a numerical increase was observed. Cobimetinib plus atezolizumab and a taxane did not appear to increase ORR. This demonstrates the potential activity of a combinatorial MEK inhibitor, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy in this difficult-to-treat population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.01.065

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the phase 2 study NCT02322814, atezolizumab plus cobimetinib and taxane had no improvement in ORR in TNBC relative to cobimetinib plus taxane.

    “However, in the phase 2 study NCT02322814, atezolizumab plus cobimetinib and taxane had no improvement in ORR in TNBC, relative to cobimetinib plus taxane [216].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 92

Authors
Brufsky, A., Kim, S. B., Zvirbule, Ž., Eniu, A., Mebis, J., Sohn, J. H., Wongchenko, M., Chohan, S., Amin, R., Yan, Y., McNally, V., Miles, D., & Loi, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
  • Asan Medical Center (KR)
  • Institute of Oncology Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta (RO)
  • Jessa Hospital (BE)
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Genentech (US)
  • Roche (Canada) (CA)
  • Roche (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Mount Vernon Hospital (GB)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Brufsky, A.
  • Loi, S.
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
652-660
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3128792891
Cited by
92
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 11
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
F. Hoffmann-La Roche
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Keywords
cobimetinib, atezolizumab, triple-negative breast cancer, metastatic breast cancer, locally advanced breast cancer, MEK inhibitors, MAPK signaling, paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, first-line therapy, progression-free survival, objective response rate, immune checkpoint inhibitors, combination chemotherapy, drug resistance, predictive biomarkers
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Azetidines, Humans, Piperidines, Paclitaxel, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review