A phase II randomized trial of cobimetinib plus chemotherapy, with or without atezolizumab, as first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (COLET): primary analysis
Open accessAbstract
Background Resistance to standard chemotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is associated with upregulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. Cobimetinib, an MAPK/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK) inhibitor, may increase sensitivity to taxanes and programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors. COLET is a three-cohort phase II study evaluating first-line cobimetinib plus chemotherapy, with or without atezolizumab, in patients with locally advanced or mTNBC. Patients and methods Patients were ≥18 years with locally advanced or mTNBC. Following a safety run-in, patients in cohort I were randomized 1:1 to cobimetinib (60 mg, D3-D23 of each 28-day cycle) or placebo, plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m 2 , D1, 8, and 15). Additional patients were randomized (1:1) to cohort II or III to receive cobimetinib plus atezolizumab (840 mg, D1 and D15) and either paclitaxel (cohort II) or nab-paclitaxel [cohort III (100 mg/m 2 , D1, D8, and D15)]. Primary endpoints were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) (cohort I) and confirmed objective response rate (ORR) (cohorts II/III). Safety and tolerability were also assessed. Results In the expansion stages, median PFS was 5.5 months for cobimetinib/paclitaxel versus 3.8 months for placebo/paclitaxel in cohort I [hazard ratio 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-1.24; P = 0.25]. In cohort I, ORR was 38.3% (95% CI 24.40-52.20) for cobimetinib/paclitaxel and 20.9% (95% CI 8.77-33.09) for placebo/paclitaxel; ORRs in cohorts II and III were 34.4% (95% CI 18.57-53.19) and 29.0% (95% CI 14.22-48.04), respectively. Diarrhea was the most common grade ≥3 adverse events across all cohorts. Conclusions Cobimetinib added to paclitaxel did not lead to a statistically significant increase in PFS or ORR, although a nonsignificant trend toward a numerical increase was observed. Cobimetinib plus atezolizumab and a taxane did not appear to increase ORR. This demonstrates the potential activity of a combinatorial MEK inhibitor, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy in this difficult-to-treat population.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the phase 2 study NCT02322814, atezolizumab plus cobimetinib and taxane had no improvement in ORR in TNBC relative to cobimetinib plus taxane.
“However, in the phase 2 study NCT02322814, atezolizumab plus cobimetinib and taxane had no improvement in ORR in TNBC, relative to cobimetinib plus taxane [216].”
From Combination strategies with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade: current advances and future directions (2022) · cites this paper as [216]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 92
- Authors
- Brufsky, A., Kim, S. B., Zvirbule, Ž., Eniu, A., Mebis, J., Sohn, J. H., Wongchenko, M., Chohan, S., Amin, R., Yan, Y., McNally, V., Miles, D., & Loi, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
- Asan Medical Center (KR)
- Institute of Oncology Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta (RO)
- Jessa Hospital (BE)
- Yonsei University (KR)
- Genentech (US)
- Roche (Canada) (CA)
- Roche (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Mount Vernon Hospital (GB)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Brufsky, A.
- Loi, S.
- Venue
- Annals of Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 652-660
- ISSN
- 0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3128792891
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 11
- FWCI
- 7.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
- Keywords
- cobimetinib, atezolizumab, triple-negative breast cancer, metastatic breast cancer, locally advanced breast cancer, MEK inhibitors, MAPK signaling, paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, first-line therapy, progression-free survival, objective response rate, immune checkpoint inhibitors, combination chemotherapy, drug resistance, predictive biomarkers
- MeSH terms
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Azetidines, Humans, Piperidines, Paclitaxel, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review