L’homme de Tautavel. Un Homo erectus européen évolué. Homo erectus tautavelensis
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The site of Caune de l'Argo highlights the possible nature of ritual cannibalism for Homo erectus, where post-cranial remains were processed differently from cranial remains, perhaps similar to the Gough's Cave assemblage, though more work is needed to confirm this.
“The site of Caune de l’Argo highlights the intriguing possible nature of ritual cannibalism for Homo erectus where the post-cranial remains have been processed in a different fashion to the cranial remains, perhaps facilitating an interpretation not dissimilar to the Gough’s Cave assemblage; although more work on this site is needed to confirm this.”
From Assessing the calorific significance of episodes of human cannibalism in the Palaeolithic (2017) · cites this paper as [20]
The possibility of Homo erectus ritual cannibalism from l'Argo could suggest that even the oldest episodes of cannibalism were social acts with cultural meaning beyond an easy meal.
“The intriguing possibility of Homo erectus ritual cannibalism from l’Argo20 could further suggest that even the oldest episodes of cannibalism were social acts that had some cultural meaning for the consumers beyond an easy meal.”
From Assessing the calorific significance of episodes of human cannibalism in the Palaeolithic (2017) · cites this paper as [20]
Cites
The status of <i>Homo heidelbergensis</i> (Schoetensack 1908)
Stringer, C. (2012) · Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.21311 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Martinón-Torres, M., Bermúdez de Castro, J. M., Gómez-Robles, A., Prado-Simón, L., & Arsuaga, J. L. (2012) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.08.007 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Saladié, P., & Rodríguez-Hidalgo, A. (2017) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-016-9306-y · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Assessing the calorific significance of episodes of human cannibalism in the Palaeolithic
Cole, J. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep44707 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- de Lumley, M.-A.
- Venue
- L'Anthropologie
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 303-348
- ISSN
- 0003-5521 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1521285959
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 35.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- L Anthropologie (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Keywords
- Homo erectus, Tautavel, Caune de l'Arago, skeletal remains, Middle Pleistocene, skull morphology, dental morphology, postcranial skeleton, hominin evolution, steppe environment, cold and dry climate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review