Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Kitaev's code, the value of non-trivial loop operators l1, l2 are fixed to +1, that is, measuring them will give +1 outcome.
“Namely, in Kitaev's code, the value of non-trivial loop operators ℓ1, ℓ2 are fixed to +1, that is, measuring them will give +1 outcome.”
From Quantum error correction and fault tolerance: A comprehensive tutorial (2026) · cites this paper as [118]
In the introductory square-lattice code example (p. 5), the paper defines its vortex-free state as a superposition of all spin configurations with plaquette values +1, not as a state selected by setting non-trivial loop measurements to +1. Section 2.3 (p. 13) defines Wilson loops but does not impose that outcome on them. The cited text therefore does not support the asserted fixed measurement result. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe stabilizer group S of Kitaev's honeycomb code is generated by 6-qubit Pauli operators on the hexagonal faces and two Pauli operators along two loops around the horizontal and vertical directions on the torus.
“The stabilizer group S is generated by 6-qubit Pauli operators on the hexagonal faces and two Pauli operators along two loops around the horizontal and vertical directions on the torus”
From Quantum error correction and fault tolerance: A comprehensive tutorial (2026) · cites this paper as [118]
Section 2.2 (p. 13) defines flux operators around hexagonal plaquettes, and Section 2.3 (p. 13) defines spin-based Wilson loop operators. These passages support the face-and-loop description, but they do not say that those operators generate a stabilizer group or specify two horizontal and vertical torus loops as its generators. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn Kitaev's honeycomb code, the gauge group G is generated by two-qubit Pauli measurements on the edges, with edge color determining the Pauli observable, and plaquette colors determine the type of 6-qubit stabilizer on that plaquette.
“This code has a gauge group G generated by two-qubit Pauli measurements on the edges of the lattice where the edge color determines its corresponding Pauli observable, while the plaquette colors determine the type of 6-qubit stabilizer on that plaquette10.”
From Quantum error correction and fault tolerance: A comprehensive tutorial (2026) · cites this paper as [118]
Section 1, “The model,” defines x-, y-, and z-links and assigns each a corresponding two-qubit Pauli term; Section 2.3 (p. 13) discusses plaquette loop operators. The copy does not describe these edge terms as generators of a code gauge group, or say that plaquette colors determine different types of six-qubit stabilizer. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredKitaev's honeycomb code is a qubit subsystem stabilizer code defined on a hexagonal lattice on the surface of a torus where qubits are placed on the vertices.
“This is the case with Kitaev's honeycomb code [118], which is a qubit subsystem stabilizer code defined on a hexagonal lattice on the surface of a torus where qubits are placed on the vertices”
From Quantum error correction and fault tolerance: A comprehensive tutorial (2026) · cites this paper as [118]
Section 1, p. 10, describes spin-1/2 degrees of freedom at the vertices of a honeycomb lattice, and the discussion accompanying Fig. 11 considers that lattice on a torus. Our copy does not identify the model as a subsystem stabilizer code, so it does not support that part of the description. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 103 · Cited by 5,245
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- [1]J. Bellissard, A. van Elst, H. Schulz-Baldes, "The noncommutative geometry of the quan- tum Hall effect," J. Math. Phys. 35, 5373–5451, (1994), cond-mat/9411052. · arXiv
- [9]L. Saminadayar, D.C.Glattli, Y. Jin, B.Etienne, "Observation of the e/3 frac- tionally charged Laughlin quasiparticles", Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2526–2529 (1997), cond-mat/9706307. · arXiv
- [10]R. de-Picciotto, M.Reznikov, M.Heiblum, V.Umansky, G.Bunin, D.Mahalu, "Direct ob- servation of a fractional charge", Nature 389, 162–164 (1997), cond-mat/9707289. · arXiv
- [16]M.B.Hastings, "Lieb-Schultz-Mattis in higher dimensions", Phys. Rev. B 69, 104431 (2004), cond-mat/0305505. · arXiv
- [19]R.Moessner, S. L. Sondhi, "Resonating valence bond phase in the triangular lattice quan- tum dimer model", Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1881–1884 (2001), cond-mat/0007378. · arXiv
- [21]T. Senthil, M.P.A. Fisher, "Fractionalization in the cuprates: Detecting the topological order", Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 292–295 (2001), cond-mat/0006481. · arXiv
- [23]R.Coldea, D.A.Tennant, A.M.Tsvelik, Z.Tylczynski, "Experimental realization of a 2d fractional quantum spin liquid", Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1335–1338 (2001), cond-mat/0007172. · arXiv
- [24]A.Yu.Kitaev, "Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons", Annals of Physics 303 no. 1, 2–30 (2003), quant-ph/9707021. · arXiv
- [27]M.H.Freedman, M.Larsen, Z.Wang, "A modular functor which is universal for quantum computation", Commun. Math. Phys. 227 no. 3, 605–622 (2002), quant-ph/0001108. · arXiv
- [31]N.Read, E.Rezayi, "Beyond paired quantum Hall states: Parafermions and incom- pressible states in the first excited Landau level", Phys. Rev. B, 59 8084–8092 (1999), cond-mat/9809384. · arXiv
- [32]R.W.Ogburn, J. Preskill, "Topological quantum computation", Lecture Notes in Com- puter Science 1509, C. P.Williams (ed.) QCQC'98, pp. 341–356, Springer-Verlag (1999).
- [34]C.Mochon, "Anyon computers with smaller groups", Phys. Rev. A 69, 032306 (2004), quant-ph/0306063. · arXiv
- Math. Phys. 234 no. 1, 129–183 (2003), quant-ph/0110060. · arXiv
- Chain", Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 227005 (2002)cond-mat/0202115. · arXiv
- Josephson junction array", Phys. Rev. B 66, 224503 (2002), cond-mat/0205186. · arXiv
- [40]B.Douçot, L.B. Ioffe, M.V.Feigel'man, "Topological order in the insulating Josephson junction array", Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 107003 (2003), cond-mat/0211146. · arXiv
- [41]B.Douçot, L.B. Ioffe, M.V.Feigel'man, "Discrete non-Abelian gauge theories in two- dimensional lattices and their realizations in Josephson-junction arrays", Phys. Rev. B 69, 214501 (2004), cond-mat/0302104. · arXiv
- [42]L.-M.Duan, E.Demler, M.D. Lukin Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 090402 (2003), cond-mat/0210564. · arXiv
- [45]A.Connes, "Noncommutative Geometry", Academic Press (1994).
- Fiz. 94 no. 9, 123–137 (1988) (in Russian) [English translation: Sov. Phys. JETP 67, 1804 (1988)].
- [48]N.Read, D.Green, "Paired states of fermions in two-dimensions with breaking of parity and time reversal symmetries, and the fractional quantum Hall effect," Phys. Rev. B 61, 10267 (2000), cond-mat/9906453. · arXiv
- [49]A.M.Tsvelik, "Quantum field theory in condensed matter physics", Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 2nd edition (2003).
- [50]E.H. Lieb, "Flux phase of the half-filled band", Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2158–2161 (1994), cond-mat/9410025. · arXiv
- Hall conductivity," J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 33 L27–L32 (2000), cond-mat/9912186. · arXiv
- [55]G.E.Volovik, "Quantum Hall and chiral edge states in thin 3He-A film", Pis'ma v ZhETF 55 no. 6, 363–367 (1992) [JETP Letters, 55 368–373 (1992)].
- [56]C. L.Kane, M.P.A. Fisher, "Quantized thermal transport in the fractional quantum Hall effect", Phys. Rev. B 55, 15832–15837 (1997), cond-mat/9603118. · arXiv
- [57]A.Cappelli, M.Huerta, G.R. Zemba, "Thermal transport in chiral conformal theories and hierarchical quantum Hall states", Nucl. Phys. B 636 no. 3, 568–582 (2002), cond-mat/0111437. · arXiv
- JETP Letters 51, 125–128 (1990)].
- [61]K.H.Rehren, "Braid group statistics and their superselection rules" in The algebraic theory of superselection sectors, D.Kastler (ed.) Proceedings Palermo 1989, pp. 333–355, World Scientific Publishing (1990).
- [63]P. Di Francesco, P.Mathieu, D. Sénéchal, "Conformal field theory", Springer (1996).
- [65]D.A. Ivanov, "Non-Abelian statistics of half-quantum vortices in p-wave superconduc- tors", Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 268–271 (2001), cond-mat/0005069. · arXiv
- [73]J. E.Avron, R. Seiler, B. Simon, "Charge deficiency, charge transport and comparison of dimensions," Commun. Math. Phys. 159 no. 2, 399–422 (1994), physics/9803014. · arXiv
- [78]R.Haag, "Local quantum physics", Springer Verlag, 2nd edition (1996).
- [80]C.Kassel, "Quantum groups" (Graduate Texts in Mathematics 155), Springer Verlag (1995).
- [82]S.Mac Lane, "Categories for the working mathematician" (Graduate Texts in Mathemat- ics 5), Springer Verlag, 2nd edition (1998).
- [84]J.-L. Loday, "Realization of the Stasheff polytope" Arch. Math. (Basel) 83 no. 3, 267–278 (2004), math.AT/0212126. · arXiv
- [85]V.G.Drinfeld, "Quantum groups", Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathe- maticians, Berkeley 1986, pages 798–820, Amer. Math. Soc. (1987).
- [86]F.A.Bais, P. van Driel, M. de Wild Propitius, "Quantum symmetries with discrete gauge symmetries", Phys. Lett. B 280, 63–70 (1992), hep-th/9203046. · arXiv
- [87]R.Dijkgraaf, V.Pasquier, P.Roche, "Quasi Hopf algebras, group cohomology and orbifold models", Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 18, 60–72 (1991).
- Chern-Simons term", Nucl. Phys. B 393, 547–570 (1993), hep-th/9203047. · arXiv
- Différentielle Catég. 39 no. 3, 163–180 (1998), q-alg/9612011. · arXiv
- [93]D.N.Yetter, " Functorial knot theory", (Series on Knots and Everything, 26), World Scientific Publishing (2001).
- [95]X.-G.Wen, "Quantum orders and symmetric spin liquids", Phys. Rev. B 65, 165113 (2002), cond-mat/0107071. · arXiv
- [96]X.-G.Wen, "Quantum orders in an exact soluble model", Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 016803 (2003), quant-ph/0205004. · arXiv
- [98]A.Hatcher, "Algebraic topology", Cambridge University Press (2002).
- Series) University of Chicago Press, Reprint edition (1993).
- Authors
- Kitaev, A.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kitaev, Alexei
- ORCID
- Kitaev, Alexei
- Venue
- Annals of Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 321
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2-111
- ISSN
- 0003-4916 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141708961
- Cited by
- 5,245
- References
- 103
- Citations by year
- 2026: 266 · 2025: 462 · 2024: 468 · 2023: 494 · 2022: 420 · 2021: 457 · 2020: 441 · 2019: 354 · 2018: 304 · 2017: 285 · 2016: 254 · 2015: 180 · 2014: 169 · 2013: 137 · 2012: 130
- FWCI
- 46.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Annals of Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Topological Materials and Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
- Keywords
- anyons, honeycomb lattice, spin-1/2 model, exactly solvable models, free fermions, Z2 gauge field, non-Abelian anyons, Abelian anyons, Chern number, phase diagram
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review