Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 323

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Advanced nanostructured photocatalysts based on reduced graphene oxide–TiO2 composites for degradation of diphenhydramine pharmaceutical and methyl orange dye

Open access
Pastrana-Martínez, Luisa M., Morales-Torres, Sergio, Likodimos, Vlassis, Figueiredo, José L., Faria, Joaquim L., Falaras, Polycarpos, Silva, Adrián M.T.·2012·Applied Catalysis B: Environmental

Abstract

Abstract Reduced graphene oxide–TiO 2 composites (GOT) were prepared by liquid phase deposition followed by post-thermal reduction at different temperatures. The composite materials were systematically evaluated as photocatalysts for the degradation of an important pharmaceutical water pollutant, diphenhydramine (DP), and an azo-dye, methyl orange (MO), under both near-UV/Vis and visible light irradiation as a function of the graphene oxide (GO) content. A marked compositional dependence of the photocatalytic activity was evidenced for DP and MO pollutants degradation and mineralization under both UV/Vis and visible light. Especially under visible light, optimum photocatalytic performance was obtained for the composites treated at 200 °C comprising 3.3–4.0 wt.% GO, exceeding that of the benchmark P25 (Evonik) catalyst. According to scanning electron microscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and porosimetry analysis data, this was attributed to the optimal assembly and interfacial coupling between the reduced GO sheets and TiO 2 nanoparticles. Almost total degradation and significant mineralization of DP and MO pollutants (in less than 60 min) was achieved under near-UV/Vis irradiation for the optimum GOT composites. However, higher GO content and calcination temperatures (350 °C) led to detrimental effects due to the GO excess and the disruption of the GO–TiO 2 binding. Photocatalytic experiments employing sacrificial hole and radical scavenging agents revealed that photogenerated holes are the primary active species in DP degradation for both bare TiO 2 and GOT under UV/Vis irradiation, while an enhanced contribution of radical mediated DP oxidation was evidenced under visible light. These results combined with the distinct quenching of the GO photoluminescence under visible and NIR laser excitation, indicate that reduced GO acts either as electron acceptor or electron donor (sensitizer) of TiO 2 under UV and visible light, respectively. Fine-tuning of the reduced GO–TiO 2 interface is concluded as a very promising route to alleviate electron–hole recombination and circumvent the inherently poor light harvesting ability of TiO 2 in the visible range.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.04.045

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 85 references

Cited by

See all 323

Metadata

Authors
Pastrana-Martínez, L. M., Morales-Torres, S., Likodimos, V., Figueiredo, J. L., Faria, J. L., Falaras, P., & Silva, A. M. T.
Venue
Applied Catalysis B: Environmental
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
123-124
Pages
241-256
ISSN
0926-3373 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082985571
Cited by
323
References
85
FWCI
10.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advanced nanostructured photocatalysts based on reduced graphene oxide–TiO2 composites for degradation of diphenhydramine pharmaceutical and methyl orange dye. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.04.045
The paper
Pastrana-Martínez, L. M., Morales-Torres, S., Likodimos, V., Figueiredo, J. L., Faria, J. L., Falaras, P., & Silva, A. M. T. (2012). Advanced nanostructured photocatalysts based on reduced graphene oxide–TiO2 composites for degradation of diphenhydramine pharmaceutical and methyl orange dye. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.04.045

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.