The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CO oxidation by Pd supported on CeO2(100) and CeO2(111) facets
Open accessAbstract
Pd/CeO2 is an active component in emission control catalysts for CO oxidation. Nanostructured CeO2 powders can be prepared in the form of rods exposing predominantly (111) surfaces and cubes exposing (100) surfaces. While differences in the reactivity of Pd supported on these facets of ceria have been reported, the origins of the reactivity differences are not well understood. Pd supported on (111) surfaces of ceria rods exhibits room-temperature CO oxidation activity, while Pd on (100) surface of ceria cubes shows comparable activity at a temperature that is 60 °C higher. Earlier, we established that Pd/CeO2-rods are active due to a Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism involving isolated Pd atoms in the form of Pd1O and Pd1O2 species. Here, we establish using in situ CO IR spectroscopy and density functional theory (DFT) that, in addition to TEM-visible Pd nanoparticles, Pd/CeO2-cubes also contain isolated Pd species, predominantly in the form of Pd1O. DFT calculations show that CO oxidation proceeds via a Mars-van Krevelen pathway, which is possible for the (100) surface because of the lower Ce-O binding energy compared to the (111) surface. Overall, the catalytic cycle for CO oxidation on Pd/CeO2(100) involves a higher free energy barrier than on Pd/CeO2(111) in keeping with the experimentally observed activity difference. EXAFS measurements show that the active Pd phase in both Pd/CeO2-rods and Pd/CeO2-cubes responds dynamically with respect to reducing and oxidizing conditions. The redispersion of Pd in oxidative conditions is more pronounced for Pd/CeO2-rods and the catalyst is more active after an oxidative treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method
Kresse, G., & Joubert, D. (1999) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1758 · Cited by 85,307
Cited by
Recent Progress on Rational Design of Bimetallic Pd Based Catalysts and Their Advanced Catalysis
Fan, J., Du, H., Zhao, Y., Wang, Q., Liu, Y., Li, D., & Feng, J. (2020) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c03280 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Spezzati, G., Benavidez, A. D., DeLaRiva, A. T., Su, Y., Hofmann, J. P., Asahina, S., Olivier, E. J., Neethling, J. H., Miller, J. T., Datye, A. K., & Hensen, E. J. M.
- Venue
- Applied Catalysis B: Environmental
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 243
- Pages
- 36-46
- ISSN
- 0926-3373 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2898062435
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CO oxidation by Pd supported on CeO2(100) and CeO2(111) facets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.10.015
- The paper
- Spezzati, G., Benavidez, A. D., DeLaRiva, A. T., Su, Y., Hofmann, J. P., Asahina, S., Olivier, E. J., Neethling, J. H., Miller, J. T., Datye, A. K., & Hensen, E. J. M. (2019). CO oxidation by Pd supported on CeO2(100) and CeO2(111) facets. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.10.015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.