Engineering Ni2P-NiSe2 heterostructure interface for highly efficient alkaline hydrogen evolution
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The shift and overlap of NiSe2 and CoSe2 XRD peaks at 30-40 degrees indicate lattice distortion from interaction between the two selenides and support heterostructure formation.
“Compared with the standard cards, the shift and superposition of NiSe 2 and CoSe 2 characteristic peaks at 301-401 could be observed, which was attributed to the lattice distortion caused by the interaction between the two selenide crystals, thus proving the formation of a bimetallic selenide heterostructure.37,38”
From Bimetallic Ni–Co selenide heterostructure aerogel for highly efficient overall water splitting (2023) · cites this paper as [38]
Cites
Anantharaj, S., Ede, S. R., Sakthikumar, K., Karthick, K., Mishra, S., & Kundu, S. (2016) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.6b02479 · Cited by 2,503 · see citing works
Pan, Y., Liu, Y., Zhao, J., Yang, K., Liang, J., Liu, D., Hu, W., Liu, D., Liu, Y., & Liu, C. (2015) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c4ta04867a · Cited by 652 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ďurovič, M., Hnát, J., & Bouzek, K. (2021) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229708 · Cited by 436 · see citing works
Liu, H., Yang, F., Chen, F., Che, S., Chen, N., Sun, S., Ta, N., Sun, Y., Wu, N., Sun, Y., et al. (2023) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2023.02.154 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citationBimetallic Ni–Co selenide heterostructure aerogel for highly efficient overall water splitting
Liu, H., Yang, F., Chen, F., Che, S., Chen, N., Xu, C., Wu, N., Wei, W., & Li, Y. (2023) · Materials Chemistry Frontiers · doi:10.1039/d2qm01082h · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Liu, C., Gong, T., Zhang, J., Zheng, X., Mao, J., Liu, H., Li, Y., & Hao, Q.
- Affiliations
- Hebei University of Technology (CN)
- Tianjin University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Hui
- Li, Ying
- Venue
- Applied Catalysis B: Environmental
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 262
- Pages
- 118245
- ISSN
- 0926-3373 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2977317031
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 8.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Catalysis B: Environmental (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Nature Science Foundation of Hebei Province (E2019202206, B2016202213)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (51402085)
- Program for the Outstanding Young Talents of Hebei Province, China
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Hydrogen Storage and Materials
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
- Keywords
- alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction, transition metal phosphides, interface engineering, electronic interaction, hydrogen adsorption energy, water adsorption, phosphorization, carbon cloth support, self-supported catalysts, electrocatalyst durability, Tafel slope
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
