Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 783

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways

Pöschl, Martina, Ward, Shane, Owende, Philip·2010·Applied Energy
DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.05.011
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.05.011

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Maeng, 1999, Biogas plants in Denmark: technological and economic developments, Appl Energy, 64, 195, 10.1016/S0306-2619(99)00067-7 · DOI
  2. Poeschl M, Ward S, Owende P. Prospects for expanded utilization of biogas in Germany. Renew Sustain Energy Rev J 2010; in press, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.04.010. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Tambone, 2009, Assessing amendment properties of digestate by studying the organic matter composition and the degree of biological stability during the anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of MSW, Bioresour Technol, 100, 3140, 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.012 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Hilkiah Igoni, 2008, Designs of anaerobic digesters for producing biogas from municipal solid-waste, Appl Energy, 85, 430, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2007.07.013 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Berglund, 2006, Assessment of energy performance in the life-cycle of biogas production, Biomass Bioenergy, 30, 254, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.11.011 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bohn, 2007, The energy balance in farm scale anaerobic digestion of crop residues at 11–37 °C, Process Biochem, 42, 57, 10.1016/j.procbio.2006.07.013 · DOI
  7. Gerin, 2008, Energy and CO2 balance of maize and grass as energy crops for anaerobic digestion, Bioresour Technol, 99, 2620, 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.049 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Lübken, 2007, Modelling the energy balance of an anaerobic digester fed with cattle manure and renewable energy crops, Water Res, 41, 4085, 10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.061 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Heller, 2004, Life cycle energy and environmental benefits of generating electricity from willow biomass, Renew Energy, 29, 1023, 10.1016/j.renene.2003.11.018 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Keoleian, 2005, Renewable energy from willow biomass crops: life cycle energy, Environ Econ Perform Crit Rev Plant Sci, 24, 385, 10.1080/07352680500316334 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Lopez-Ridaura, 2009, Environmental evaluation of transfer and treatment of excess pig slurry by life cycle assessment, J Environ Manage, 90, 1296, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.07.008 · DOI
  12. Ishikawa, 2006, Evaluation of a biogas plant from life cycle assessment (LCA), Int Congr Ser, 1293, 230, 10.1016/j.ics.2006.02.008 · DOI
  13. Cherubini, 2009, Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: landfilling, sorting plant and incineration, Energy, 34, 2116, 10.1016/j.energy.2008.08.023 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Fricke, 2005, Comparison of selected aerobic and anaerobic procedures for MSW treatment, Waste Manage, 25, 799, 10.1016/j.wasman.2004.12.018 · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2004.12.018
  15. Sawayama, 1999, Anaerobic treatment of liquidized organic wastes, Renew Energy, 16, 1094, 10.1016/S0960-1481(98)00425-X · doi:10.1016/s0960-1481(98)00425-x
  16. Börjesson, 2008, Biogas as a resource-efficient vehicle fuel, Trends Biotechnol, 26, 7, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.09.007 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Lunghi, 2004, Life-cycle-assessment of fuel-cells-based landfill-gas energy conversion technologies, J Power Sour, 131, 120, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.01.006 · DOI
  18. Holm-Nielsen, 2009, The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization, Bioresour Technol, 100, 5478, 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.046 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Schievano, 2009, Substituting energy crops with organic wastes and agro-industrial residues for biogas production, J Environ Manage, 90, 2537, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.013 · DOI
  20. European Commission (EC). Council Regulation No. 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers. Official Journal of the European Union, Brussels, Belgium; 2003.
  21. Mata-Alvarez, 2000, Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives, Bioresour Technol, 74, 3, 10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00023-7 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Eder, 2004, More gas as from liquid manure, Wochenblatt-Serie Energie, BLW, 47, 45
  23. Hejnfelt, 2009, Anaerobic digestion of slaughterhouse by-products, Biomass Bioenergy, 33, 1046, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Sonesson, 2000, Modelling of waste collection – a general approach to calculate fuel consumption and time, Waste Manage Res, 18, 115, 10.1177/0734242X0001800203 · doi:10.1177/0734242x0001800203
  25. Sonesson, 2000, Environmental and economic analysis of management systems for biodegradable waste, Resour Conserv Recycl, 28, 29, 10.1016/S0921-3449(99)00029-4 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Neef, 2009, International overview of hydrogen and fuel cell research, Energy, 34, 327, 10.1016/j.energy.2008.08.014 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Cigolotti, 2008, Biofuels as opportunity for MCFC niche market application, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 33, 2999, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.03.038 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.03.038
  28. van Herle, 2003, Energy balance model of a SOFC cogenerator operated with biogas, J Power Sour, 118, 375, 10.1016/S0378-7753(03)00103-4 · doi:10.1016/s0378-7753(03)00103-4
  29. Trogisch, 2005, Operation of molten carbonate fuel cells with different biogas sources: a challenging approach for field trials, J Power Sour, 145, 632, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.02.053 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.02.053
  30. Praetorius B, Schneider L. Micro cogeneration: towards a decentralized and sustainable German energy system? In: 29th IAEE international conference, Potsdam, Germany; 2006.
  31. Bruno, 2009, Integration of absorption cooling systems into micro gas turbine trigeneration systems using biogas: case study of a sewage treatment plant, Appl Energy, 86, 837, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.08.007 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Schuster, 2009, Energetic and economic investigation of organic rankine cycle applications, Appl Therm Eng, 29, 1809, 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.08.016 · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.08.016
  33. Dong, 2009, Development of small-scale and micro-scale biomass-fuelled CHP systems – a literature review, Appl Therm Eng, 29, 2119, 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.12.004 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Demirbas, 2009, Political, economic and environmental impacts of biofuels: a review, Appl Energy, 86, S108, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.04.036 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Kübler, 2000, Full scale co-digestion of organic waste, Water Sci Technol, 41, 195, 10.2166/wst.2000.0072 · DOI
  36. Nilsson, 1997, Energy, exergy and energy analysis of using straw as fuel in district heating plants, Biomass Bioenergy, 13, 63, 10.1016/S0961-9534(97)00025-1 · DOI
  37. Walla, 2008, The optimal size for biogas plants, Biomass Bioenergy, 32, 551, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.11.009 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 783

Metadata

Authors
Pöschl, M., Ward, S., & Owende, P.
Venue
Applied Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11
Volume
87
Issue
11
Pages
3305-3321
ISSN
0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.05.011
OpenAlex
W1972749747
Cited by
783
References
1
FWCI
95.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.05.011
The paper
Pöschl, M., Ward, S., & Owende, P. (2010). Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways. Applied Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.05.011

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.