An energy analysis comparing biomass torrefaction in depots to wind with natural gas combustion for electricity generation
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Forest residues usually have low bulk and energy densities but high moisture content, which tends to generate high costs for feedstock transportation, handling, and drying.
“In addition, forest residues usually have both low bulk and energy densities but high moisture content, which tends to generate a high cost for feedstock transportation, handling, and drying [13,14].”
From Lifecycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis of Biochar Pellet Production from Forest Residues and Field Application (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 20
- Authors
- Parkhurst, K. M., Saffron, C. M., & Miller, R. O.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Saffron, Christopher M.
- Venue
- Applied Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 179
- Pages
- 171-181
- ISSN
- 0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2466287662
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 277 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Applied Energy (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Food and Agriculture (MICL02289)
- AgBioResearch, Michigan State University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
- Keywords
- biomass torrefaction, wind energy, natural gas combustion, electricity generation, energy return on investment, renewable energy, bioenergy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
