The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Monitoring and diagnosis of energy consumption in wastewater treatment plants. A state of the art and proposals for improvement
Open accessAbstract
In response to strong growth in energy intensive wastewater treatment, public agencies and industry began to explore and implement measures to ensure achievement of the targets indicated in the 2020 Climate and Energy Package. However, in the absence of fundamental and globally recognized approach evaluating wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) energy performance, these policies could be economically wasteful. This paper gives an overview of the literature of WWTP energy-use performance and of the state of the art methods for energy benchmarking. The literature review revealed three main benchmarking approaches: normalization, statistical techniques and programming techniques, and advantages and disadvantages were identified for each one. While these methods can be used for comparison, the diagnosis of the energy performance remains an unsolved issue. Besides, a large dataset of WWTP energy consumption data, together with the methods for synthesizing the information, are presented and discussed. It was found that no single key performance indicators (KPIs) used to characterize the energy performance could be used universally. The assessment of a large data sample provided some evidence about the effect of the plant size, dilution factor and flowrate. The technology choice, plant layout and country of location were seen as important elements that contributed to the large variability observed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Integrating micro-algae into wastewater treatment: a review
Mohsenpour, S. F., Hennige, S., Willoughby, N., Adeloye, A., & Gutierrez, T. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142168 · Cited by 828
Capodaglio, A., & Olsson, G. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12010266 · Cited by 328
A Review on the Use of Microalgae for Sustainable Aquaculture
Han, P., Lu, Q., Fan, L., & Zhou, W. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9112377 · Cited by 270
Towards the optimization of sustainable food-energy-water systems: a stochastic approach
Karan, E., Asadi, S., Mohtar, R., & Baawain, M. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.051 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Longo, S., d’Antoni, B. M., Bongards, M., Chaparro, A., Cronrath, A., Fatone, F., Lema, J. M., Mauricio-Iglesias, M., Soares, A., & Hospido, A.
- Venue
- Applied Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 179
- Pages
- 1251-1268
- ISSN
- 0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2479182137
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monitoring and diagnosis of energy consumption in wastewater treatment plants. A state of the art and proposals for improvement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.043
- The paper
- Longo, S., d’Antoni, B. M., Bongards, M., Chaparro, A., Cronrath, A., Fatone, F., Lema, J. M., Mauricio-Iglesias, M., Soares, A., & Hospido, A. (2016). Monitoring and diagnosis of energy consumption in wastewater treatment plants. A state of the art and proposals for improvement. Applied Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.043
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.